DavidSomerset Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 I don't think he's worth the #11 pick, but what would it take to get him? Would 11 for Ridnour/Wilcox work? Would Salim/AJ get him??? Horford at 3 Nick Young at 11 Trade for Ridnour Call it a day! Ridnour/Lue JJ/Nick Young MW/Chillz Smoove/Shelden Zaza/Horford Nick Young would give us some GREAT energy and scoring off the bench. That is a nice looking young team, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WraithSentinel Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 I hope BK know that Woodson will bench Luke in a New York minute once he see him play defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidSomerset Posted June 26, 2007 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 * Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholasp27 Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 in that scenario, i still draft law/critt to go behind ridnour, not young we don't need to use #11 on a backup to mr. 40 mins, jj we already have that backup, chill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidSomerset Posted June 26, 2007 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 He hangs out around the basket...That's where he gets about all his points. He can't create his own shot at all...Nick Young would give us the best SG in the draft, and someone who can give JJ some rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted June 26, 2007 Premium Member Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 Marvin for Ridenour and 2008 first top 8 protected, top 3 in 2009. This would kinda clear up some things for both teams. I think Lewis is traded and Durant may be a future PF. Wilcox is nice, but I don't think we need him with our draft fortunes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasPete Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 We could have had Ridnour for Indys pick last season and it was worth far less than today. The pick turned out to be 11 instead of 15 so why would we spend it on him now when we thought it was too much back during the season? It makes no sense and I'm not believing the rumor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholasp27 Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 u wanna give up marvin for anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teeareess Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 No way I trade Marvin for that. And no, Durant's not going to be a power forward for atleast a few years. I'd like to try and take either Wilcox or one of Seattle's project bigs in a trade if possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDude Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 Although Ridnour's defense is bad, he's no worse than Lue but IMO he can setup players better than Lue. I would want more than just Rid for my #11 though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragitoff Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 One thing about Ridnour that BK might be thinking is could Woody's PG rotation be a Speedy for defense and Ridnour for offense? Speedy is your typical, no offense (bad jumpshot)-good defense PG while Ridnour is a great scorer and distributor but poor defensive PG. I know you'd like to have both qualities in a PG, but that might be the logic behind the desire to have him here. I don't know, it's just a thought. My logic goes out the window here, but what if we traded Marvin Williams, #11 pick, Speedy Claxton and one other player for Luke Ridnour and Rashard Lewis in a Sign and trade? We could still draft our pick of Yi/Horford Ridnour/Lue/AJ JJ/Slim Lewis/Chillz Smoove/Yi or Horford/Jones Shelden/Pachulia/Wright It would probably take more to get that deal than that, but just a crazy thought. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeti Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 When you go back and look at the two games we played against Seattle, it looks like there was not THAT much difference between Ridnour and Lue. Ridnours stats are slightly better for those two games but not that much. So why are we so hot after him? Is he really the answer to our PG woes or just another in the line of Speedy, Lue, AJ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member mrhonline Posted June 26, 2007 Premium Member Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 They've played four games head-to-head in their careers. Per48's: Ridnour --> 21.4 ppg, 7.5 asts., 3.3 rebs., 3.7 to's, 1.9 fouls Lue --> 14.1 ppg, 7.2 asts., 2.9 rebs., 1.4 to's, 4.0 fouls Both players have some major warts, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNorthCydeRises Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 That's why you can't take him seriously in any deal concerning Marvin. He'll give up Marvin for a bag of Doritos and a Yoohoo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now