Bucher's Top 20 Free Agents and Best Fits

[Admin]

Tomorrow he'll post 1-10 but until then ...

Thanks to the Spurs, Cavaliers and Magic, it's possible to believe that at least some NBA teams are more committed to raising a championship banner than protecting their profit margin.

Now the questions are: how committed? Will anybody else join the party? And if they do, will they make the right choices?

While the 2010 free-agent class might be loaded with franchise cornerstones, the current class has enough cornices and rebar to upgrade a team from fixer-upper to showcase status. Even if Kobe Bryant, Mehmet Okur and Carlos Boozer opt to enter the pool, the options for reworking a team's foundation are limited. (Bryant has indicated he'd only opt out to sign a longer deal with the Lakers, so he is not included in the rankings.) That's not great for Detroit and Oklahoma City, who have the most cap room and are looking to upgrade their core. But for teams in search of specialty items, there is an array of young role players and battle-tested veterans available.

The key, as always, is paying the right price and adding pieces that don't just look nice, but fit the décor. The 76ers blew their budget landing Elton Brand last summer, not anticipating that he'd bog down their up-tempo offense. The Clippers emptied the till to get Baron Davis, not figuring on Brand's defection or Davis balking at coach Mike Dunleavy's play-calling. The Magic, conversely, made a lower-profile move in signing guard Mickael Pietrus, but his athleticism, 3-point shooting and ability to defend bigger wings filled a glaring need at shooting guard and made him an invaluable ingredient in getting them to the Finals.

It's through that lens that we'll examine the 20 free agents (11-20 on Monday, 1-10 on Tuesday) who could have the biggest impact next season, either on their current teams if they're re-signed or on a new team badly needing their services. To help any real or imaginary GMs, a synopsis of what each player can deliver at this stage of his career (which might not match popular opinion) and the best and worst systems for him are included. You know, just in case someone's thinking of building a grand staircase for a mobile home.

UFA = Unrestricted free agent

RFA = Restricted free agent

11. Jason Kidd, PG, Mavericks (UFA)

His game: Vast change from Kidd of yesteryear. Now he's a respectable spot-up shooter and defender who plays angles and shepherds his man into help. Still has uncanny ability to find an open man with the game on the line, milk a hot hand or recognize a mismatch. Good post-up threat but no longer finishes in traffic. Pass-ahead, fast-break starter off rebounds.

Right system: A balanced offense that he can initiate, but which features a threat who requires double teams. Still good in a team-defense concept, so needs smart teammates and an organized coach. Athletic wings are a must to exploit his outlet passes and protect him on defense. Lots of off-the-ball, pass-and-cut movement allows him to utilize his passing, vision and timing.

Wrong system: A rip-and-run offensive style with no title-contending hopes or aspirations or players capable of moving without the ball.

Best fits: Mavericks, Lakers, Cavaliers, Rockets, Magic, Hawks, Celtics

12. Ron Artest, SF, Rockets (UFA)

His game: A matchup nightmare because of his 3-point shooting, handle and physical ability to take contact and still score. Enlivened by defensive challenges, his strength, tenacity and deceptive agility -- even if it has diminished -- make him a rather aggravating cover guy.

Right system: Half-court game with a calm, communicating coach adept at exploiting offensive mismatches. A team with a solid decision-making star who has enough game to command Artest's trust and respect.

Wrong system: My-way-or-the-highway coach without a star bigger than Artest, one that demands its small forward make plays or one that has no chance at the playoffs.

Best fits: Lakers, Rockets, Celtics, Cavaliers

13. Mike Bibby, PG, Hawks (UFA)

His game: One of the best 3-point-shooting PGs in league. Still effective on pick-and-rolls but more of a set-up-the-offense, flare-to-the-corner type now. A defensive liability but better in a strong team concept. Is not a playmaker but doesn't try to be one; moves the ball on the perimeter, happy to feed and play off a bona fide star.

Right system: Thrives with passing big men, a slower pace, a player's coach and at least one screen-setting big man. Long, athletic, hard-nosed wings are recommended so he can hide on defense.

Wrong system: Anywhere that requires him to create shots or provide dribble penetration. A team that lacks a shot-blocker or at least one defensive-oriented wing.

Best fits: Hawks, Blazers, Rockets, Grizzlies, Wizards, Hornets

14. Shawn Marion, SF/PF, Raptors (UFA)

His game: Even though age has somewhat diminished his legendary pogo-stick legs, the faster the game, the better he is. Unheralded defender, both helping and on the ball. Moves well off the ball and has array of flip shots from 10 feet and in. Can make 3s but at this point is most effective when he keeps those to a minimum.

Right system: Up-tempo with a first-rate passing point guard. Moves well enough that he can play with or without a dominant post player.

Wrong system: Lots of chuckers, because Marion's energy suffers without touches and when his defensive responsibilities are overly isolated.

Best fits: Knicks, Hornets, Bulls, 76ers, Suns, Raptors

15. Paul Millsap, PF, Jazz (RFA)

His game: Space-eater around the rim. Tenacious rebounder, especially good at cleaning up the offensive boards. Can score in the post but limited as a passer. Face-up game is almost acceptable. No jumper beyond 15 feet. Not a shot-blocker but very good at keeping bigger, more talented players off the block or away from their spots.

Right system: Needs shooters around him and a playmaking, penetrating point guard. Works best in a structured system in which he has a well-defined, contributing role.

Wrong system: An up-tempo, free-flowing offense or a defense without a shot-blocker or solid perimeter defenders. Has neither shot-blocking chops nor agility to help on dribble drives. Would get lost next to a post-dominating big man.

Best fits: Jazz, Blazers, Suns, Celtics, Pistons, Nuggets

16. Drew Gooden, PF, Spurs (UFA)

His game: Designated post-up scorer. Is not going to block shots or find cutters but is an above-average rebounder and can create shots for himself on the block, a precious commodity.

Right system: A simple but disciplined one, where his marching orders are clear. Look for him to provide points when the offense bogs down and jumpers are not falling, and he won't disappoint.

Wrong system: A read-and-react format in which he has to provide a defensive post presence or make plays.

Best fits: Spurs, Bulls, Heat, Blazers

17. Allen Iverson, PG/SG, Pistons (UFA)

His game: Improvisational scorer, still capable of breaking down almost any defender off the dribble. Age, plus wear and tear, has him relying more on his midrange jumper than getting to the rim. Needs a strong but thoughtful coach to keep him focused and committed.

Right system: A team that has a need for an electric scorer off the bench, featuring a loose, offensive-oriented attack and a locker room/coach strong enough to keep him happy with that role. Preferably without a post scorer to clog up the lane.

Wrong system: Highly structured scheme that doesn't have at least two excellent perimeter defenders to hide Iverson's steal-or-else defensive approach. A coach without a pedigree would not be good, either.

Best fits: Magic, Warriors, Wizards, Celtics, Suns

18. David Lee, PF/C, Knicks (RFA)

His game: Energy and defense without needing plays called for him. Will sacrifice his body on screens and charges. Undersized but athletic, hard-nosed and low-maintenance. Rebound and loose-ball fiend. Good hands and decent with putbacks and finishing around the rim off pick-and-roll. Not much of a threat beyond 15 feet or on post-ups. Willing help defender, but not a shot-blocker.

Right system: Up-tempo is ideal because he'll outrun most bigs in transition. Need at least three scorers, ideally four, so he has room and reason to chase down rebounds and putbacks. Can't play off an offensive post threat because he doesn't have the jumper to space the floor. Mobile enough to show on the guard in pick-and-roll defense and get back to a rolling big.

Wrong system: A methodical half-court set with a dominant scoring center who is not a shot-blocker.

Best fits: Suns, Blazers, Jazz, Rockets, Thunder, Warriors

19. Linas Kleiza, SF, Nuggets (RFA)

His game: Streaky spot-up shooter from 3-point range. No real in-between game. Unafraid to go strong to the rim and has the muscle to take contact and finish. Good lane-filler on the break. Willing on-the-ball defender who fights over screens and uses his size well to crowd opponents. Not much of a help defender.

Right system: Needs a playmaking point guard or double-team-drawing star because he doesn't create his own shot. Better in a team-oriented, lock-'em-up defensive system with a bona fide shot-blocker so he can crowd opponents and use his strength without fear of getting beat off the dribble. Also better in a structured offense because he moves without the ball well and understands spacing.

Wrong system: An up-and-down style with lots of one-on-one play because he'll get lost in the shuffle, which is what happened in Denver last season.

Best fits: Cavs, Lakers, Hornets, Spurs, Magic

20. Channing Frye, SF/PF, Blazers (RFA)

His game: Solid jump shooter with 3-point range. Unafraid to take and make crunch-time shots, even when playing limited minutes. High basketball IQ. Not a physical player but can post up players his size or smaller. Limited defensively by his size and strength but makes an effort.

Right system: A drive-and-kick offense willing and able to move the ball around the perimeter and disciplined defense with willing and able help defenders. Not a shot-blocker, so he needs to be protected -- not the protector -- around the rim.

Wrong system: Up-tempo, fast-break style. Just not quick or explosive enough to make that work as an undersized power forward. Not going to flourish with a shoot-first point guard, either.

Best fits: Pistons, Heat, Magic

[mattlanta]

I wouldn't mind Kidd but I'd rather have Bibby to mentor Teague.

[xhawk]

I wouldn't mind Kidd but I'd rather have Bibby to mentor Teague.

Bibby probably fits "Woody's System" better, but I think that Kidd fits our personnel better, especially after signing Crawford.

[drzachary]

Hm.. I think David Lee would be good here. Probably too much $.

[coachx]

Bucher described Mike Bibby very well. We really need his ability to space the floor in the half court and he has a calming influence when teams make runs on us.

[AHF]

I would love to see what our forwards do with Kidd as the point guard. Kidd made Marion look like an offensive star. Josh, Marvin and Horf could go crazy with him.

[AtLaS]

I would love to see what our forwards do with Kidd as the point guard. Kidd made Marion look like an offensive star. Josh, Marvin and Horf could go crazy with him.

Are you talking about Martin? Or were you confusing Kidd with Nash lol.

But, I agree with the second statement. I'd love to have him here for a year or two.

[AHF]

Are you talking about Martin? Or were you confusing Kidd with Nash lol.

But, I agree with the second statement. I'd love to have him here for a year or two.

Marion as a second year player with Kidd led the Phoenix Suns in points per game - the only time Marion has ever led a team in PPG in his career. You are right, though, that Martin is probably an even better example. Heck, let's use both of them. Kidd is a godsend for athletic forwards.

[frankthetank966]

I wouldn't mind Kidd but I'd rather have Bibby to mentor Teague.

I would rather Kidd. He is a playmaker

[tbhawksfan]

I'd take Kidd over Bibby at any point in their careers. Bibby was a total liability on D and on O he only brought the three. He had an almost two month period before the end of the season where he wasn't contributing squat. Didn't exactly shine in the playoffs either.

Bibby is by no mans the worst you could do, but he's also very far from the best you could do.

Kidd over Bibby anytime.

[Admin]

And the top 10

Thanks to the Spurs, Cavaliers and Magic, it's possible to believe that at least some NBA teams are more committed to raising a championship banner than protecting the profit margin.

Now the questions are: How committed? Will any other teams join the party? And if they do, will they make the right choices?

Although the 2010 free-agent class might be loaded with franchise cornerstones, the current class has enough cornices and rebar to upgrade a team from fixer-upper to showcase status. Even if Kobe Bryant, Mehmet Okur and Carlos Boozer opt to enter the pool, the options for reworking a team's foundation are limited. (Bryant has indicated he'd opt out of his contract only to sign a longer deal with the Lakers, so he is not included in the rankings.) That's not great for Detroit and Oklahoma City, which have the most cap room and are looking to upgrade their respective cores. But for teams in search of specialty items, an array of young role players and battle-tested veterans are available.

The key, as always, is to pay the right price and add pieces that don't just look nice but also fit the decor. The 76ers blew their budget by landing Elton Brand last summer, not anticipating that he'd bog down their up-tempo offense. The Clippers emptied the till to add Baron Davis, not figuring on Brand's defection or Davis' balking at coach Mike Dunleavy's play calling. The Magic, conversely, made a lower-profile move in signing guard Mickael Pietrus, but his athleticism, 3-point shooting and ability to defend bigger wings filled a glaring need at shooting guard and made him an invaluable ingredient in getting them to the Finals.

It's through that lens that we examine the 20 free agents who could have the biggest impact next season, either on their current teams if they're re-signed or on a new team badly needing their services. To help any real or imaginary GMs, a synopsis of what each player can deliver at this stage of his career (which might not match popular opinion) and the best and worst systems for him are included. You know, just in case someone is thinking of building a grand staircase for a mobile home.

*UFA = unrestricted free agent

*RFA = restricted free agent

1. Hedo Turkoglu, SF/PF, Magic (UFA)

His game: Playmaking forward who is as close to LeBron James as any 30-year-old in the league can be. Very good passer but a better scorer, particularly in the clutch. Has complete face-up game -- 3s off the dribble, pull-up jumpers and the ability to finish at the rim. Size and length discourage most teams from attacking him defensively, but without a shot-blocker behind him, he's an easy mark.

Right system: In short: Orlando's. Doesn't have stamina to orchestrate offense all night but is fearless when needed. Has to have shooters spacing the floor because his handle is shaky in traffic. Also needs a strong team-defense concept.

Wrong system: A point guard-dominated one or any emphasizing pick-and-rolls or a drive-and-kick style in which he's not directly involved. Loses much of his value if he's merely a spot-up threat or a third option. Up-tempo is not his strength, either, because he has amazing skills but average athleticism for a small forward/power forward.

Best fits: Magic, Pistons, Blazers, Grizzlies, Bucks

2. Carlos Boozer, PF, Jazz (UFA)

His game: Equally adept at pick-and-roll and pick-and-pop. Confidence-based jump shooter -- when he's feeling it, he knocks them down, but when he's not, his shot is way off. Better inside when he can body an opponent. Average on-the-ball defender, not a shot-blocking or ball-hawking presence. Exceptional offensive rebounder, especially off his own shots, and strong on boards overall.

Right system: The more structured, the better, but he needs a similarly versatile big next to him. Has to have a dominant playmaker to use all his strengths and a shot-blocking center to protect his defensive weaknesses. Ideally, he's the second or third option, even though he would like to be the first. Needs an organization that advertises its belief in him publicly and privately.

Wrong system: One in which he's not at least the second option or in which public critiques by coach/GM/owner are accepted. He's an elephant: He never forgets. Long bigs who can match his agility give him fits, which is why he can't be a team's only front-line threat.

Best fits: Cavaliers, Lakers, Celtics, Magic, Grizzlies, Jazz

3. Ben Gordon, SG, Bulls (UFA)

His game: Scorer, pure and simple. Despite his size (6-foot-3), he can elevate and knock down contested jumpers off the dribble against almost anybody and get to the rim. Quick brakes and release are the keys. Mediocre or worse in every other aspect of the game, but you can count on between 20 to 30 points every night and half of those in the fourth quarter.

Right system: Simple and wide-open with a place to hide him on defense. Teammates who will do the dirty work without complaint and a point guard strong enough to keep the rest of the team involved and defend the opposing shooting guard.

Wrong system: Low-scoring, defensive-oriented team that sees him as anything more than a designated scorer. Not likely to mesh with a star who expects to get the ball at crunch time. Has to have an agile shot-blocker behind him to discourage opponents from exploiting his size and overall lack of defense.

Best fits: Bulls, Hawks, Mavericks, Timberwolves, Knicks, Suns, Hornets

4. Andre Miller, PG, 76ers (UFA)

His game: Strong on pick-and-rolls and post-ups. Remarkably effective when getting into the paint, considering he is not a threat from farther than 20 feet. Much better finisher than passer in the paint, unless it's a lob. Uses his size and strength well when he can get up into his man on defense; capable of guarding both 2s and 1s.

Right system: A self-sufficient one in which he can be a closer rather than creator. Works well as a calming influence in an up-tempo attack. Exceptional rebounder for a point guard, so when he's paired with athletic wings, there are lots of transition points.

Wrong system: Anything that asks him to be a traditional point guard. A post-up big man limits the best parts of his game. Needs a star who draws double-teams and an alley-oop big man to open up his midrange game.

Best fits: 76ers, Blazers, Warriors, Heat, Raptors, Knicks, Pacers

5. Rasheed Wallace, PF/C, Pistons (UFA)

His game: Unlimited jump-shooting range with ability to turn and score over either shoulder in the post. Excellent help and on-the-ball defender when he's in the mood; has strength to play behind and length to three-quarters on the block. Smartest all-around post defender in the league.

Right system: Half-court, slower tempo, now that age has cut his endurance. Requires a commanding, battle-tested coach because he won't hesitate to go off the reservation at the first whiff of uncertainty or incompetence. Needs an aggressive No. 1 offensive option because he would rather play off a star than be one. A team and coach with a defensive focus are important to keep him committed to the cause.

Wrong system: One without clearly defined roles. Or a team that relies on him night in and night out, offensively or defensively, or with a coach still learning the ropes.

Best fits: Celtics, Mavericks, Spurs, Magic

6. Mehmet Okur, C, Jazz (UFA)

His game: Versatile scorer, particularly lethal on pick-and-pops and weakside 3s, but has a serviceable post game against slower bigs. Deceptively nimble. Also a deceptively effective passer. Makes an effort to defend the ball but is nonexistent giving help. Decent defensive rebounder.

Right system: Ideally a pick-and-roll-dominated offense in which he is the third option, although he's capable of being the No. 2 guy next to a shot-blocking power forward. Also needs a dominant point guard who can draw the defense and allow him to go one-on-one or shoot on the catch. Needs plays run for him to get shots.

Wrong system: A one-on-one dominated attack that doesn't allow offense to be a form of defense or expects him to score off rebounds. Okur won't lock down anybody or break anyone down, so he needs an offense that gets him shots in general -- and 3s, in particular -- to win his matchup.

Best fits: Jazz, Warriors, Bulls, Cavaliers, Magic, Spurs, 76ers, Suns

7. Lamar Odom PF/SF, Lakers, (UFA)

His game: Ultimate facilitator, the basketball equivalent of a utility infielder. Capable of a little of everything -- post scoring, 3-pointers, dribble drives, assists, rebounds, blocked shots -- and usually does exactly that.

Right system: Any that he can enhance rather than engineer. Needs a strong leader, an understanding coach and hard-nosed guys next to him up front to handle the physical chores in the paint. The more structure, the better, because decision-making is suspect.

Wrong system: An inflexible one that counts on him to contribute in a specific area. He does not impose his will, so it's paramount that he finds a matchup he can exploit naturally. Can't be the best or second-best player.

Best fits: Lakers, Spurs, Magic, Celtics

8. Trevor Ariza, SF, Lakers (UFA)

His game: Streaky 3-point shooter, good finisher off cuts, but marginal handle and no midrange jumper off the dribble. Tenacious, eager defender, both on the ball and in passing lanes. Quick and lanky but surprisingly strong, so he can defend bigger players in the post.

Right system: A structured defensive-oriented one with at least one playmaker, because he's not comfortable shooting contested jumpers. Extremely quiet, so leadership has to come from elsewhere. Very adept at moving without the ball and a willing passer, so he flourishes in a pass-and-cut offense.

Wrong system: Freewheeling, drive-and-kick in which he has to handle or be a playmaker. His 3-point shot still isn't good enough to be a staple of his game.

Best fits: Lakers, Cavaliers, Celtics, Bobcats, Magic, Spurs, Rockets, Pistons, Jazz

9. Anderson Varejao, PF/C, Cavaliers

His game: Defensive stopper on the post, clever moving without the ball, chasing loose balls and rebounds for extra possessions, excellent help defender in every way except as a shot-blocker. Deceptively agile and athletic. Finishes well around the rim in traffic. Jump shot is improving but still unreliable.

Right system: Defensive-oriented with four offensive threats around him, leaving him free to score off putbacks and backdoor cuts. Drive-and-kick in which he's the big rolling to the basket.

Wrong system: Post-player-dominated offense or scheme based on pick-and-rolls in which he's not involved. Those frameworks eliminate his cuts off the ball for baskets or chances for putbacks.

Best fits: Cavaliers, Celtics, Hawks, Bulls, Nuggets, Thunder, Suns

10. Marvin Williams, SF, Hawks (RFA)

His game: Versatile scorer, especially now that he has developed corner 3-point range. Can isolate and score on post moves or face-up drives. Might have been Hawks' best defender when healthy; developing into stopper for league's growing legion of playmaking small forwards.

Right system: Handle still needs improvement, so he needs shooters/scorers who space the floor. Good transition finisher. Would flourish with a disciplined defensive team.

Wrong system: One built around a dominant, scoring post player, because the best part of his offensive game is around the paint, and his 3-point shooting isn't that good.

Best fits: Heat, Mavericks, Blazers, Pistons, Bulls, Hawks

[thesheedera]

And the top 10

Thanks to the Spurs, Cavaliers and Magic, it's possible to believe that at least some NBA teams are more committed to raising a championship banner than protecting the profit margin.

Now the questions are: How committed? Will any other teams join the party? And if they do, will they make the right choices?

Although the 2010 free-agent class might be loaded with franchise cornerstones, the current class has enough cornices and rebar to upgrade a team from fixer-upper to showcase status. Even if Kobe Bryant, Mehmet Okur and Carlos Boozer opt to enter the pool, the options for reworking a team's foundation are limited. (Bryant has indicated he'd opt out of his contract only to sign a longer deal with the Lakers, so he is not included in the rankings.) That's not great for Detroit and Oklahoma City, which have the most cap room and are looking to upgrade their respective cores. But for teams in search of specialty items, an array of young role players and battle-tested veterans are available.

The key, as always, is to pay the right price and add pieces that don't just look nice but also fit the decor. The 76ers blew their budget by landing Elton Brand last summer, not anticipating that he'd bog down their up-tempo offense. The Clippers emptied the till to add Baron Davis, not figuring on Brand's defection or Davis' balking at coach Mike Dunleavy's play calling. The Magic, conversely, made a lower-profile move in signing guard Mickael Pietrus, but his athleticism, 3-point shooting and ability to defend bigger wings filled a glaring need at shooting guard and made him an invaluable ingredient in getting them to the Finals.

It's through that lens that we examine the 20 free agents who could have the biggest impact next season, either on their current teams if they're re-signed or on a new team badly needing their services. To help any real or imaginary GMs, a synopsis of what each player can deliver at this stage of his career (which might not match popular opinion) and the best and worst systems for him are included. You know, just in case someone is thinking of building a grand staircase for a mobile home.

*UFA = unrestricted free agent

*RFA = restricted free agent

1. Hedo Turkoglu, SF/PF, Magic (UFA)

His game: Playmaking forward who is as close to LeBron James as any 30-year-old in the league can be. Very good passer but a better scorer, particularly in the clutch. Has complete face-up game -- 3s off the dribble, pull-up jumpers and the ability to finish at the rim. Size and length discourage most teams from attacking him defensively, but without a shot-blocker behind him, he's an easy mark.

Right system: In short: Orlando's. Doesn't have stamina to orchestrate offense all night but is fearless when needed. Has to have shooters spacing the floor because his handle is shaky in traffic. Also needs a strong team-defense concept.

Wrong system: A point guard-dominated one or any emphasizing pick-and-rolls or a drive-and-kick style in which he's not directly involved. Loses much of his value if he's merely a spot-up threat or a third option. Up-tempo is not his strength, either, because he has amazing skills but average athleticism for a small forward/power forward.

Best fits: Magic, Pistons, Blazers, Grizzlies, Bucks

2. Carlos Boozer, PF, Jazz (UFA)

His game: Equally adept at pick-and-roll and pick-and-pop. Confidence-based jump shooter -- when he's feeling it, he knocks them down, but when he's not, his shot is way off. Better inside when he can body an opponent. Average on-the-ball defender, not a shot-blocking or ball-hawking presence. Exceptional offensive rebounder, especially off his own shots, and strong on boards overall.

Right system: The more structured, the better, but he needs a similarly versatile big next to him. Has to have a dominant playmaker to use all his strengths and a shot-blocking center to protect his defensive weaknesses. Ideally, he's the second or third option, even though he would like to be the first. Needs an organization that advertises its belief in him publicly and privately.

Wrong system: One in which he's not at least the second option or in which public critiques by coach/GM/owner are accepted. He's an elephant: He never forgets. Long bigs who can match his agility give him fits, which is why he can't be a team's only front-line threat.

Best fits: Cavaliers, Lakers, Celtics, Magic, Grizzlies, Jazz

3. Ben Gordon, SG, Bulls (UFA)

His game: Scorer, pure and simple. Despite his size (6-foot-3), he can elevate and knock down contested jumpers off the dribble against almost anybody and get to the rim. Quick brakes and release are the keys. Mediocre or worse in every other aspect of the game, but you can count on between 20 to 30 points every night and half of those in the fourth quarter.

Right system: Simple and wide-open with a place to hide him on defense. Teammates who will do the dirty work without complaint and a point guard strong enough to keep the rest of the team involved and defend the opposing shooting guard.

Wrong system: Low-scoring, defensive-oriented team that sees him as anything more than a designated scorer. Not likely to mesh with a star who expects to get the ball at crunch time. Has to have an agile shot-blocker behind him to discourage opponents from exploiting his size and overall lack of defense.

Best fits: Bulls, Hawks, Mavericks, Timberwolves, Knicks, Suns, Hornets

4. Andre Miller, PG, 76ers (UFA)

His game: Strong on pick-and-rolls and post-ups. Remarkably effective when getting into the paint, considering he is not a threat from farther than 20 feet. Much better finisher than passer in the paint, unless it's a lob. Uses his size and strength well when he can get up into his man on defense; capable of guarding both 2s and 1s.

Right system: A self-sufficient one in which he can be a closer rather than creator. Works well as a calming influence in an up-tempo attack. Exceptional rebounder for a point guard, so when he's paired with athletic wings, there are lots of transition points.

Wrong system: Anything that asks him to be a traditional point guard. A post-up big man limits the best parts of his game. Needs a star who draws double-teams and an alley-oop big man to open up his midrange game.

Best fits: 76ers, Blazers, Warriors, Heat, Raptors, Knicks, Pacers

5. Rasheed Wallace, PF/C, Pistons (UFA)

His game: Unlimited jump-shooting range with ability to turn and score over either shoulder in the post. Excellent help and on-the-ball defender when he's in the mood; has strength to play behind and length to three-quarters on the block. Smartest all-around post defender in the league.

Right system: Half-court, slower tempo, now that age has cut his endurance. Requires a commanding, battle-tested coach because he won't hesitate to go off the reservation at the first whiff of uncertainty or incompetence. Needs an aggressive No. 1 offensive option because he would rather play off a star than be one. A team and coach with a defensive focus are important to keep him committed to the cause.

Wrong system: One without clearly defined roles. Or a team that relies on him night in and night out, offensively or defensively, or with a coach still learning the ropes.

Best fits: Celtics, Mavericks, Spurs, Magic

6. Mehmet Okur, C, Jazz (UFA)

His game: Versatile scorer, particularly lethal on pick-and-pops and weakside 3s, but has a serviceable post game against slower bigs. Deceptively nimble. Also a deceptively effective passer. Makes an effort to defend the ball but is nonexistent giving help. Decent defensive rebounder.

Right system: Ideally a pick-and-roll-dominated offense in which he is the third option, although he's capable of being the No. 2 guy next to a shot-blocking power forward. Also needs a dominant point guard who can draw the defense and allow him to go one-on-one or shoot on the catch. Needs plays run for him to get shots.

Wrong system: A one-on-one dominated attack that doesn't allow offense to be a form of defense or expects him to score off rebounds. Okur won't lock down anybody or break anyone down, so he needs an offense that gets him shots in general -- and 3s, in particular -- to win his matchup.

Best fits: Jazz, Warriors, Bulls, Cavaliers, Magic, Spurs, 76ers, Suns

7. Lamar Odom PF/SF, Lakers, (UFA)

His game: Ultimate facilitator, the basketball equivalent of a utility infielder. Capable of a little of everything -- post scoring, 3-pointers, dribble drives, assists, rebounds, blocked shots -- and usually does exactly that.

Right system: Any that he can enhance rather than engineer. Needs a strong leader, an understanding coach and hard-nosed guys next to him up front to handle the physical chores in the paint. The more structure, the better, because decision-making is suspect.

Wrong system: An inflexible one that counts on him to contribute in a specific area. He does not impose his will, so it's paramount that he finds a matchup he can exploit naturally. Can't be the best or second-best player.

Best fits: Lakers, Spurs, Magic, Celtics

8. Trevor Ariza, SF, Lakers (UFA)

His game: Streaky 3-point shooter, good finisher off cuts, but marginal handle and no midrange jumper off the dribble. Tenacious, eager defender, both on the ball and in passing lanes. Quick and lanky but surprisingly strong, so he can defend bigger players in the post.

Right system: A structured defensive-oriented one with at least one playmaker, because he's not comfortable shooting contested jumpers. Extremely quiet, so leadership has to come from elsewhere. Very adept at moving without the ball and a willing passer, so he flourishes in a pass-and-cut offense.

Wrong system: Freewheeling, drive-and-kick in which he has to handle or be a playmaker. His 3-point shot still isn't good enough to be a staple of his game.

Best fits: Lakers, Cavaliers, Celtics, Bobcats, Magic, Spurs, Rockets, Pistons, Jazz

9. Anderson Varejao, PF/C, Cavaliers

His game: Defensive stopper on the post, clever moving without the ball, chasing loose balls and rebounds for extra possessions, excellent help defender in every way except as a shot-blocker. Deceptively agile and athletic. Finishes well around the rim in traffic. Jump shot is improving but still unreliable.

Right system: Defensive-oriented with four offensive threats around him, leaving him free to score off putbacks and backdoor cuts. Drive-and-kick in which he's the big rolling to the basket.

Wrong system: Post-player-dominated offense or scheme based on pick-and-rolls in which he's not involved. Those frameworks eliminate his cuts off the ball for baskets or chances for putbacks.

Best fits: Cavaliers, Celtics, Hawks, Bulls, Nuggets, Thunder, Suns

10. Marvin Williams, SF, Hawks (RFA)

His game: Versatile scorer, especially now that he has developed corner 3-point range. Can isolate and score on post moves or face-up drives. Might have been Hawks' best defender when healthy; developing into stopper for league's growing legion of playmaking small forwards.

Right system: Handle still needs improvement, so he needs shooters/scorers who space the floor. Good transition finisher. Would flourish with a disciplined defensive team.

Wrong system: One built around a dominant, scoring post player, because the best part of his offensive game is around the paint, and his 3-point shooting isn't that good.

Best fits: Heat, Mavericks, Blazers, Pistons, Bulls, Hawks

very very interesting

glad to see him get some good press

[WillieStatZ]

very very interesting

glad to see him get some good press

Its not suprising though. He's a good player.. and at that age alot of teams would love to have him.

[Bahamut]

10. Marvin Williams, SF, Hawks (RFA)

Did I beat Diesel? :jeer:

[Admin]

Did I beat Diesel? :jeer:

I don't know but he's awfully quiet today so you must have beat him bad :no-no:

[Bahamut]

I don't know but he's awfully quiet today so you must have beat him bad :no-no:

:hush: if he finds out, we are SO dead

[Final_quest]

What I've been trying to figure out is who is gonna make an offer over the MLE for Bibby? So many point guards drafted, and so few teams wanting to spend. Also, Bibby's age makes him a stop gap type player. It's just hard for me to imagine him getting a big offer.

[sturt]

Andre Miller

His game: Strong on pick-and-rolls and post-ups. Remarkably effective when getting into the paint, considering he is not a threat from farther than 20 feet. Much better finisher than passer in the paint, unless it's a lob. Uses his size and strength well when he can get up into his man on defense; capable of guarding both 2s and 1s.

Right system: A self-sufficient one in which he can be a closer rather than creator. Works well as a calming influence in an up-tempo attack. Exceptional rebounder for a point guard, so when he's paired with athletic wings, there are lots of transition points.

Wrong system: Anything that asks him to be a traditional point guard. A post-up big man limits the best parts of his game. Needs a star who draws double-teams and an alley-oop big man to open up his midrange game.

Rasheed Wallace

His game: Unlimited jump-shooting range with ability to turn and score over either shoulder in the post. Excellent help and on-the-ball defender when he's in the mood; has strength to play behind and length to three-quarters on the block. Smartest all-around post defender in the league.

Right system: Half-court, slower tempo, now that age has cut his endurance. Requires a commanding, battle-tested coach because he won't hesitate to go off the reservation at the first whiff of uncertainty or incompetence. Needs an aggressive No. 1 offensive option because he would rather play off a star than be one. A team and coach with a defensive focus are important to keep him committed to the cause.

Wrong system: One without clearly defined roles. Or a team that relies on him night in and night out, offensively or defensively, or with a coach still learning the ropes.

Is it just me, or does anyone else read his summaries of Miller and Wallace and come away with the question, "And you eliminated Hawks as a good fit on what basis then?"

The main concern w/ Miller insofar as I can ascertain is that he's simply asking for a fortune for a player his age, but that has nothing to do with "fit." And as for Sheed, the only thing I can see there is the concern about who is coaching him, and as far as anyone has ever said, he's always had a good relationship with Woodson.

Dunno.

[Admin]

Is it just me, or does anyone else read his summaries of Miller and Wallace and come away with the question, "And you eliminated Hawks as a good fit on what basis then?"

The main concern w/ Miller insofar as I can ascertain is that he's simply asking for a fortune for a player his age, but that has nothing to do with "fit." And as for Sheed, the only thing I can see there is the concern about who is coaching him, and as far as anyone has ever said, he's always had a good relationship with Woodson.

Dunno.

As far as I can see with Miller it might be that he's "not a creator" although I disagree with that. With Rasheed it's probably that we already have a starting PF and we're not seen as a half-court offense. Right or wrong we're probably seen around the league as an uptempo team and perhaps neither of those players fit on a team like that?

I'd like to see either of them on the Hawks though for the right price and the right role. Sheed would have to come off the bench for me unless Marvin wasn't brought back and then I'd move Smoove back to SF.

[MaceCase]

Andre Miller

His game: Strong on pick-and-rolls and post-ups. Remarkably effective when getting into the paint, considering he is not a threat from farther than 20 feet. Much better finisher than passer in the paint, unless it's a lob. Uses his size and strength well when he can get up into his man on defense; capable of guarding both 2s and 1s.

Right system: A self-sufficient one in which he can be a closer rather than creator. Works well as a calming influence in an up-tempo attack. Exceptional rebounder for a point guard, so when he's paired with athletic wings, there are lots of transition points.

Wrong system: Anything that asks him to be a traditional point guard. A post-up big man limits the best parts of his game. Needs a star who draws double-teams and an alley-oop big man to open up his midrange game.

Rasheed Wallace

His game: Unlimited jump-shooting range with ability to turn and score over either shoulder in the post. Excellent help and on-the-ball defender when he's in the mood; has strength to play behind and length to three-quarters on the block. Smartest all-around post defender in the league.

Right system: Half-court, slower tempo, now that age has cut his endurance. Requires a commanding, battle-tested coach because he won't hesitate to go off the reservation at the first whiff of uncertainty or incompetence. Needs an aggressive No. 1 offensive option because he would rather play off a star than be one. A team and coach with a defensive focus are important to keep him committed to the cause.

Wrong system: One without clearly defined roles. Or a team that relies on him night in and night out, offensively or defensively, or with a coach still learning the ropes.

The bolded parts are reasons why I can't see both those players working with our team.