Refs are calling bogus fouls! Geez!

[Atlantaholic]

Seriously, if these plays are this obvious and one-sided, then why aren't we seeing any reports from any of the analysts or sports commentators(besides Holman, Nique and Rathbun) to even suggest we might have gotten shafted? Oh, that's right.....it's a conspiracy to get the Bulls to the next round. RIIIIIIIIIGHT!

It's not a conspiracy. It's favoritism and bias: Hence -

Questionable call against rose - Every front page of every media outlet displays it (including the AJC)

Rose grabs Teague by his waist and throws him out of the way - No mention of it anywhere.

I don't know if you've noticed this but every media outlet pretty much just worries about regurgitating the same s*** every other media outlet regurgitates. Not to mention in sports journalism (the nadir of all media...and that's saying a lot). All they are worried about is building hype hence their fixation on marketable stars and their FAVORITISM in their coverage. The majority of these "experts" seriously don't even watch the games, they just repeat whatever it is they feel is the popular opinion. Rose is the MVP, he is the future of this league, yada yada yada. Maybe they'll watch 10 minutes of the game and formulate an opinion around that. Sacramento got freaking robbed in 2002 and anyone who saw game 6 can tell you that. Did the media hark on the obviously biased officiating? No, the media has no interest in people becoming disenchanted with the league, because the NBA's and the other pro league's ratings are THEIR ratings also. Same s*** with the roids era. Every freaking sports journalist worth his freaking salt knew what was going on, hell, most fans knew what was going on... but everyone turns a blind eye. Pro basketball officaiting sucks and favors the superstars and their teams,anyone who ignores crap media and thinks for themselves can see that, and ex referees have admitted it. Last game was a prime example of it.

Edited May 12, 2011 by Atlantaholic

[ngc7]

It's not a conspiracy. It's favoritism and bias: Hence -

Questionable call against rose - Every front page of every media outlet displays it (including the AJC)

Rose grabs Teague by his waist and throws him out of the way - No mention of it anywhere.

I don't know if you've noticed this but every media outlet pretty much just worries about regurgitating the same s*** every other media outlet regurgitates. Not to mention in sports journalism (the nadir of all media...and that's saying a lot). All they are worried about is building hype hence their fixation on marketable stars and their FAVORITISM in their coverage. The majority of these "experts" seriously don't even watch the games, they just repeat whatever it is they feel is the popular opinion. Rose is the MVP, he is the future of this league, yada yada yada. Maybe they'll watch 10 minutes of the game and formulate an opinion around that. Sacramento got freaking robbed in 2002 and anyone who saw game 6 can tell you that. Did the media hark on the obviously biased officiating? No, the media has no interest in people becoming disenchanted with the league, because the NBA's and the other pro league's ratings are THEIR ratings also. Same s*** with the roids era. Every freaking sports journalist worth his freaking salt knew what was going on, hell, most fans knew what was going on... but everyone turns a blind eye. Pro basketball officaiting sucks and favors the superstars and their teams,anyone who ignores crap media and thinks for themselves can see that, and ex referees have admitted it. Last game was a prime example of it.

i know right, its funny how fans think the media cares and they will call out the nba. they care about there job and family.