AtLaS Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Quote: Quote: damnit, we lose 6 in a row, and the one game where we have no chance in the world to win, we win. We suck. Can't even tank right. Seriously, how frustrating is it to be a Hawk fan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmooveTheFuture Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Quote: Childress has been horrible. 2-12 then he lets Butler go the length of the court and dunk on him. This is the reason we should trade Childress this offseason he will never be nothing more then a bench player. He is a awful starter and his numbers prove it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunar Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 you can't be mad at the fact that the team won. who knew they had a shot. zaza stepped up, johnson stepped up, and the wizards choked. this was a good win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtLaS Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Please tell me how this win helped us? I'm waiting.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtLaS Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Shelden only got 12 minutes tonight, and had 6 points!!! SAD, wtf is Woody's problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunar Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 it's a win. you know... "we play to win the game?" i've never played to lose. maybe you have, but i wouldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrReality Posted March 8, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Quote: Quote: Childress has been horrible. 2-12 then he lets Butler go the length of the court and dunk on him. This is the reason we should trade Childress this offseason he will never be nothing more then a bench player. He is a awful starter and his numbers prove it. I agree with trading him. Probably the most valuable tradeable player we have. Gotta wonder if tonight showed what could be, could've been if we have developed our young talent along the way. They can play, it's Woody that can't coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtLaS Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Quote: it's a win. you know... "we play to win the game?" i've never played to lose. maybe you have, but i wouldn't. I can understand you not wanting to tank, but when it's virtually impossible to make the playoffs and there are less than 20 games left, there really is nothing positive about winning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunar Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 other than the fact that we won. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BusBoyIsBack Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Quote: Please tell me how this win helped us? I'm waiting.. It keeps us in the playoff race. We're 6 games out with 20+ to go. We're closer to the playoffs than we are to Greg Oden. At least we can control our own destiny when it comes to playing in games. THere is zero chance they would let the lottery balls fly our way even if we did have the 3rd worst record. We couldn't even get them to go our way when we had the worst record in the nba and you guys think we would get it now??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted March 8, 2007 Moderators Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Quote: other than the fact that we won. If you were playing basketball against a supermodel and knew that (1) if you lost the game she would think you were fun and playing around and you would have a 45% chance to sleep with her and (2) if you played to win and pounded her that she would think you are a jerk and have nothing to do with you, what would you do? Would you beat her 20-0 and then go have dinner by yourself basking in the glow of that win? Or would you think that the potential payoff of losing the game is so much greater than the positive of winning that you would lose on purpose and take your shot at the big payoff? You have to measure the lasting benefit from a winning outcome against any lasting cost even if you don't like to lose at anything, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted March 8, 2007 Moderators Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Quote: THere is zero chance they would let the lottery balls fly our way even if we did have the 3rd worst record. We couldn't even get them to go our way when we had the worst record in the nba and you guys think we would get it now??? Because the lottery is a function of chance not design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TroyMcClure Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Quote: If you were playing basketball against a supermodel and knew that (1) if you lost the game she would think you were fun and playing around and you would have a 45% chance to sleep with her and (2) if you played to win and pounded her that she would think you are a jerk and have nothing to do with you, what would you do? Would you beat her 20-0 and then go have dinner by yourself basking in the glow of that win? Or would you think that the potential payoff of losing the game is so much greater than the positive of winning that you would lose on purpose and take your shot at the big payoff? they could have posed the question like that. Makes tanking sound a lot more attractive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted March 8, 2007 Moderators Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Quote: Quote: If you were playing basketball against a supermodel and knew that (1) if you lost the game she would think you were fun and playing around and you would have a 45% chance to sleep with her and (2) if you played to win and pounded her that she would think you are a jerk and have nothing to do with you, what would you do? Would you beat her 20-0 and then go have dinner by yourself basking in the glow of that win? Or would you think that the potential payoff of losing the game is so much greater than the positive of winning that you would lose on purpose and take your shot at the big payoff? they could have posed the question like that. Makes tanking sound a lot more attractive. I guess extending that anology would make a top lottery pick who ends up being a bust (1) a supermodel who ends up either sucking in bed and being a high-maintenance brat or (2) a supermodel who gives you a VD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now