DeacKillsaDevil Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3257159 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 I think that's a pretty darn good move for the Cavs. I have always felt like Gooden was underrated but Wallace will more than replace what he provided other than a little offensive help. Hughes didn't fit in with that team and couldn't stay healthy and isn't nearly the shooter that Wally is. West still has a chance to be a good player as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiral Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 IMO this is TERRIBLE for the Cavs. Why in the world would you do that deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prolific25 Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Interesting deal...I don't see the point of the Cavs taking on Wallace though. He's got the worst attitude of any player in the trade and he's going to get even less minutes and be even less effective in Cleveland than he was in Chicago. West/Wally/Smith all seem like excellent fits playing next to Lebron though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragitoff Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 I was trying to figure out their new starting lineup? Surely, you don't bring Ben Wallace or Big Z off the bench with their contracts do you? Gibson James Wally Big Ben Z That's a few people playing out of position and Gibson's far from a true PG, but unless you start West, who else starts? Eric Snow? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiral Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Quote: I think that's a pretty darn good move for the Cavs. I have always felt like Gooden was underrated but Wallace will more than replace what he provided other than a little offensive help. Hughes didn't fit in with that team and couldn't stay healthy and isn't nearly the shooter that Wally is. West still has a chance to be a good player as well. Why? I mean Ben Wallace has been pretty bad this year. His contract is God-Awful. His defense used to more than make up for his offensive defencies, but I don't think they do anymore. Wally is a decent player, but vastly overpaid. He's a spot up shooter. Thats about it. IMO, you can get close to the same kind of production out of someone like Brent Barry or Matt Carrol who likely would've come at far less expense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plastic Man Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 This seems like a trade just to appease Lebron temporarily. Cavs still don't have a real PG. What is Paxson doing btw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted February 21, 2008 Premium Member Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Quote: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3257159 Let's see: Cavs get Wallace, Szerbiac, West and Joe Smith. Chicago gets: Gooden, Hughes, Simmons, and Brown. Seattle gets ending contracts and Marshall. Gentlemen, now is the best time that the Hawks have to go somewhere. While Wallace will improve rebounding and defense.... they gave up too many athletic players to get him. Plus, Szerbiac is a great shooter, but you already have 2 guys standing on the three point line already. They will miss the defense of Hughes and the veteran leadership of Marshall. Chicago didn't improve a whole lot either. They add yet another SG. BUT.. They make Noah the man. I don't know if that's good or bad. Noah is so sometimy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJHAWK Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 I kind of like the deal for Clevland in the respect that when they do win games its because of their defense and having Wallace back there helps a whole lot. They added to their strength in my opinion. Wally can shoot and Hughes seems like he is always hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prolific25 Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Ben Wallace is awful. I would think Smith is going to start for now and that Varejeao will take over the starting spot when he is healthy. West is probably going to start at pg because you don't need a true pg when you have some one like Lebron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prolific25 Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Quote: This seems like a trade just to appease Lebron temporarily. Cavs still don't have a real PG. What is Paxson doing btw? I think Ben Wallace is a cancer so they just traded him for whatever they can get. Hughes is pretty bad but he's been playing much better recently and Gooden is solid with a solid contract. I'd probably take Hughes or Gooden over Wallace especially when you consider he's 33 with 2 more years on his contract after this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragitoff Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 So that's Joe, Wallace, Z, and Varajeo to man the 4/5? That's good depth, but they are seriously lacking a PG. Makes you wonder if there isn't another deal in place to send Z somewhere for a PG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudderfudder77 Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Quote: This seems like a trade just to appease Lebron temporarily. Cavs still don't have a real PG. What is Paxson doing btw? Getting rid of a mistake. Getting younger. Saving a few million. Dumping a cancer. What do you expect Ben W to net them? Its essentially a garbage for garbage trade. We don't like our garbage, we think their garbage smells better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudderfudder77 Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Oh, and he opened up playing time for Noah - who had proven himself a better player than Ben when given minutes - and Tyrus Thomas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 I think this deal is better for Cleveland than people realize. West was actually a pretty good pg for the Celtics. he can hit the 3 and play good D. He doesn't break down the defense that well but he doesn't need to with Lebron there. Having so many shooters will really open things up for Lebron and Big Z. Joe Smith is a good pickup for them too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plastic Man Posted February 21, 2008 Report Share Posted February 21, 2008 Paxson signed Wallace in the first place. Now they can pay Hughes + Badden = $20M next year instead. Oh and they lost a productive and expiring contract player in Joe Smith. SO is Skiles coming back now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mudderfudder77 Posted February 22, 2008 Report Share Posted February 22, 2008 I'll go ahead and address this point by point... Quote: Paxson signed Wallace in the first place. Yes, it was a mistake. Now he is trying to rectify that mistake. Wheres the issue? Quote: Now they can pay Hughes + Badden = $20M next year instead. Or they could continue paying Wallace and Smith 21million for next season. The Bulls saved approx 3 million by doing this trade, and Larry's contract doesn't run longer than Ben's. Whats your point? Quote: Oh and they lost a productive and expiring contract player in Joe Smith. Drew Gooden is just as productive, and just as expiring as Joe Smith - what's your point? I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about. Quote: SO is Skiles coming back now? Considering he quit on the team, why would they want him back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plastic Man Posted February 22, 2008 Report Share Posted February 22, 2008 Quote: Yes, it was a mistake. Now he is trying to rectify that mistake. Wheres the issue? Well at least he's consistent. Quote: Or they could continue paying Wallace and Smith 21million for next season. The Bulls saved approx 3 million by doing this trade, and Larry's contract doesn't run longer than Ben's. Whats your point? I think you fuddered those numbers a bit. But hey whatever it takes to make you feel better. Quote: Drew Gooden is just as productive, and just as expiring as Joe Smith - what's your point? I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about. You're playin yourself. Quote: Considering he quit on the team, why would they want him back? I think it was the other way around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlHorford Posted February 22, 2008 Report Share Posted February 22, 2008 At first thought after seeing this trade, I said... really? But after looking at it... I like it... but don't love it for the Cavs. They still lack a reliable #2 option to go with LeBron. However, Gibson when he gets back from injury and Wally on the perimeter gives you 2 40+ percent 3 point shooters and Damon Jones is good from range too. Joe Smith still has a very consistent jumpshot. Not to mention they were able to keep Z. That should give them a pretty decent committee to be the #2 option. But the team defense is going to be absolutely amazing when they all get used to playing together. Big Z and Wallace clogging the paint is a scary thought. West plays very solid defense for a guard as does Pavlovic whenever he gets back. This team is also BUILT for the playoffs. A frontline of Z, Wallace, Varejao and Joe Smith is pretty damn good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted February 22, 2008 Moderators Report Share Posted February 22, 2008 Quote: I think this deal is better for Cleveland than people realize. West was actually a pretty good pg for the Celtics. he can hit the 3 and play good D. He doesn't break down the defense that well but he doesn't need to with Lebron there. Having so many shooters will really open things up for Lebron and Big Z. Joe Smith is a good pickup for them too. West was the guy who I also thought about when I saw these names. He isn't bad at all as long as you don't need him to run your offense. It would not surprise me to see West and Smith make as big an impact as Wally & Ben. It is the acquisitions of West and Smith that make me like this deal for Cleveland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now