KB21 Posted November 30, 2003 Report Share Posted November 30, 2003 ......tell me. Was this a game where, after Reef had four games in a row where he scored at least 26 points, the Hawks decided to go away from him? This inconsistency is getting maddening! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pathway23 Posted November 30, 2003 Report Share Posted November 30, 2003 in the first half Reef shot the ball twice, in the 2nd half they went to him more and he delivered, too little too late. Iverson torched our back court we have got to get help in our back court, SGs are killing us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blunt91 Posted November 30, 2003 Report Share Posted November 30, 2003 I would have yanked Nailon and Jackson who were missing too many shots. Jackson only shoots 29%from 3ptrange. So why does he continue to shoot so many 3pointers? Just call Jax the new Antoine Walker of the Eastern Conference.Stotts might as well had took a chance and played Hanson some in the game. He might have brought some energy and hustle to a lethargic offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyman3 Posted November 30, 2003 Report Share Posted November 30, 2003 if it wasnt for JT... Sixers would have KILLED US by 20+... Seems like Carter/Iverson always has his best games against us... I always thought teams like Philly/New Orleans gave us the most trouble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sd79 Posted November 30, 2003 Report Share Posted November 30, 2003 Coach needs to bench Glover and maybe Jackson 2. It's really getting old. I know Diaw is not all that on offense but I bet his FGA wouldn't be worse then Glovers. I wouldn't even mind if Hansen got a few starts. I don't know what Stotts is waiting for. How many bad shooting nights does it take? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Focus Posted November 30, 2003 Report Share Posted November 30, 2003 If Reef only shot the ball twice in the 1st half, I would like to know why from Scott. The whole NBA know if Hawks got a W, Reef is the biggest reason. And the whole NBA know people can't really shut down Reef. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted November 30, 2003 Report Share Posted November 30, 2003 I'm not one to make excuses for Reef, but he did look tired last night to me. He couldn't have carried the team last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Playmaker0017 Posted December 1, 2003 Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 I have to agree with Hots. Reef did look tired. But, on the other hand, tired or not, he needed more than 2 shots. He worked hard in the paint for position, only to have the ball swung around. I think Reef did his part, and would have done a little more if given the opportunity, but I think someone else ALSO needed to chip in. Play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OGRat Posted December 1, 2003 Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 I agree. If Ronald Murray can be benched, why can't Dion or SJax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now