Chris Kirschner: Hawks quiet in free agency but already nailed off season

[sturt]

6 minutes ago, REHawksFan said:

Thanks

 

37 minutes ago, sturt said:

or one can be persuaded that the other person was not actually engaged in any substantive way that allowed either to occur.

 

 

[REHawksFan]

6 minutes ago, sturt said:

 

 

 

Well again, I'm neither trying to change your opinion nor asking a question to change mine. I simply stated an observation about you and your interactions on the board. Do with it whatever you want.

[sturt]

1 hour ago, sturt said:

At the risk of parsing words and offending, "disingenuous" normally is associated with intent... so that's why I ask.

So, to the contrary, if that's accurate then it seems you do "pretend to know (my) intent."

What am I missing in that assessment?

 

So, this is pretty much par for the course, if I recall correctly.

That is, there comes a point in a discussion when RE figures he has three options... concede the point, figure out some way to not concede the point, or abandon the conversation... and given that the first is evidently unacceptable... the second is evidently unattainable... then he's left with the default.

Yes. I'm still the villain in these stories. The disingenuous villain. Of course.

Oh the irony? Yes. Oh, the irony.

 

[AHF]

I think we are way past the point of anything substantive happening about the topic of this thread.