DJlaysitup Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 I can't pronounce any of those names anyways. Yep...and no way I could spell those in the chatroom after a few drinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaceCase Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 Oh, so we're more about appearances now than actually receiving compensation for a player? We're letting a player walk for nothing, when we could have gotten 2 players and a 1st round pick. That's negative compensation. The Hawks would be paying the Bucks to take Josh, what kind of f***ed up logic is that? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watchman Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 The 2 player part is overstated. Two grossly overpaid players, eating up cap space but providing nothing to the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bahamut Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 Yep...and no way I could spell those in the chatroom after a few drinks. Or before drinks, for that matter. Life's too short. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaceCase Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 Seems the 1st was a cherry for taking the bad contracts.Why protect it then? It's like putting a cherry on top of a shit sundae and then taking the cherry back when you place it down on the table. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators PSSSHHHRRR87 Posted February 21, 2013 Moderators Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 Oh, so we're more about appearances now than actually receiving compensation for a player? We're letting a player walk for nothing, when we could have gotten 2 players and a 1st round pick. And why is getting something so damn important? I'd rather have cap space to be able to choose who eats up that space. I'd rather give Mayo or the likes that $9 mil that we would have been paying Mbah a Moute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Q45T Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 lol @ that deal... glad Ferry didn't let Milwaukee dump their overpaid trash in our laps in exchange for a potential All-Star. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJlaysitup Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 Oh, so we're more about appearances now than actually receiving compensation for a player? We're letting a player walk for nothing, when we could have gotten 2 players and a 1st round pick. I think it's the money...we are cheap, cheap, cheap. We moved Morrow for an expiring...pay no attention to the statements by management/ownership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragitoff Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 (edited) People who say he should have taken that deal rather than let Smith walk for nothing obviously know nothing about the NBA and how salary caps work. Why would we take back guys who are role players and one is not even that when they have deals beyond this year? We have alot of cap space to "potentially" sign 2 max FA's since techinically the only money we'll have on the books is Horford ($12 million), Williams ($5.225 million) and Jenkins ($1.258 million). If the salary cap is approximately $58.5 million that's $40 million for the rest of your team. Obviously we'd have to renounce Josh, Teague and all other FA's to have that full amount (plus our draft picks). Taking back LRMaM and Udoh would have meant we would have had approximately $9 million less to work with. You can get a pretty solid player for $9 million in today's NBA. Edited February 21, 2013 by Dragitoff 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 I think it's the money...we are cheap, cheap, cheap. We moved Morrow for an expiring...pay no attention to the statements by management/ownership.Isn't Morrow also an expriing?People who say he should have taken that deal rather than let Smith walk for nothing obviously know nothing about the NBA and how salary caps work. Why would we take back guys who are role players and one is not even that when they have deals beyond this year? We have alot of cap space to "potentially" sign 2 max FA's since techinically the only money we'll have on the books is Horford ($12 million), Williams ($5.225 million) and Jenkins ($1.258 million). If the salary cap is approximately $58.5 million that's $40 million for the rest of your team. Obviously we'd have to renounce Josh, Teague and all other FA's to have that full amount (plus our draft picks). Taking back LRMaM and Udoh would have meant we would have had approximately $8 million less to work with. You can get a pretty solid player for $8 million in today's NBA. THIS!! Better off not paying for garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragitoff Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 Isn't Morrow also an expriing?THIS!! Better off not paying for garbage. Yes he was. That was a net zilch deal. Jones makes less than Morrow but they were both expiring. Jones is a little bigger I think and a better defender so that's the only reason I can see it was done. Think Deshawn Stevenson, but not as good. meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WraithSentinel Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 I knew the deal was bad. Then I saw the contracts they had. This deal just look worse all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member NineOhTheRino Posted February 21, 2013 Premium Member Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 But why stress over a few million? The Hawks will have money to burn. All of this is moot unless they have plans to sign a big name. Wake me when that happens. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yungsta Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 im glad ferry rejected the team. why take back garbage who still have multiple years left on their contract just to say we traded smoove? who will be off the books this off season. on top of that the pick is protected!!! If we would of taken that deal we would of been the laughing stock of the league and it would hurt ferry's rep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLBob Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 That CANNOT have been the deal.Surely the pick was unprotected. If it were: Wow, that's a terrible offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member BrazilianHawk Posted February 21, 2013 Premium Member Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 Who cares if he plays nice. If he walks we keep the flexibility of the cap space. If we don't get a sign and trade we like let him walk again. Hm... So our starting lineup next season will be TeagueJenkinsCapspaceFlexibilityHorford Looks good, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drzachary Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 Hm... So our starting lineup next season will be TeagueJenkinsCapspaceFlexibilityHorford Looks good, eh? I just cackled. Bravo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member BrazilianHawk Posted February 21, 2013 Premium Member Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 lol @ that deal... glad Ferry didn't let Milwaukee dump their overpaid trash in our laps in exchange for a potential All-Star. Erm... sorry. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phoostal Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 Hm... So our starting lineup next season will be TeagueJenkinsCapspaceFlexibilityHorford Looks good, eh? I see what you did there, some fans are so clever, haha. I forgot next season we will go into it with only 3 guys on the roster. Damn thought we were going to have more players. Guess those three guys will be able to pad their stats. Doom and gloom. Lets see how the off season goes first before we judge them today. Seems kind of silly to see what the team is going to look like at the beginning of next year when we are so far away. But, I appreciate you letting me know what Ferry's plan is. It actually might be making some sort of NBA history playing with 3 players all year. I'm pretty sure that would be history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitte Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 (edited) Hm... So our starting lineup next season will be TeagueJenkinsCapspaceFlexibilityHorford Looks good, eh? Yeah I am kicking myself right now. We could have this: TeagueBeno UdrihLuc Mbah a MouteHorfordZaza+a couple of late first rounders How crazy would that be? Edited February 21, 2013 by nitte 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now