DeacKillsaDevil Posted March 3, 2015 Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 So are we going into the playoffs with an open roster spot while Payne is proving he can play up in Minnesota? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member hawkman Posted March 3, 2015 Premium Member Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 Report said Spurs might be interested. That's interesting If the Spurs are interested, I'm interested. What do they see that the rest of us can't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batfanjordanv Posted March 3, 2015 Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 I don't want him to be our Andrew Bynum. As much as I criticize our bench big man rotation, at least they have chemistry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted March 3, 2015 Moderators Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 So are we going into the playoffs with an open roster spot while Payne is proving he can play up in Minnesota? I think you are overselling his performance in Minny. 22.7 mpg 6.3 ppg 31.3% FG% 36.3% TS% HORRIBLE ORTG 79 UGHHH THIS TASTES TERRIBLE DRTG 113 OH, THIS IS AWFUL 3.9 PER NOT SURE IT WENT THAT LOW, DISGUSTING -0.096 WS/48 CAN'T HOLD BACK ANY LONGER.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeacKillsaDevil Posted March 3, 2015 Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 So he's already better than Pero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted March 3, 2015 Premium Member Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 If the Spurs are interested, I'm interested. What do they see that the rest of us can't? You mean the rest of yall. The guy is athletic, he's a natural shot blocker, he's physical and he's young. He's like a mold of clay. IF he doesn't pan out, you can always drop him.. no harm no foul. However, we approach the thought of picking up a talent as if it will ruin team chemistry forever??? Really? This could be a gift. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted March 3, 2015 Moderators Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 So he's already better than Pero. Hmmmm... PP36 - Pero better FG% - Pero better TS% - Pero better Ortg - Pero better Drtg - Pero better PER - Pero better WS/48 - Pero better I'm not sure "better" means what you think it means! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Posted March 3, 2015 Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 Payne's shooting has been putrid. I can't believe he's struggling this much to shoot the ball at this level. I expect he'll get it figured out at some point though and still be a good player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted March 3, 2015 Moderators Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 Payne's shooting has been putrid. I can't believe he's struggling this much to shoot the ball at this level. I expect he'll get it figured out at some point though and still be a good player. He is plenty young enough to do that and we are talking about small sample size but he has been terrible so far. Anyone who craps on Pero should be destroying Payne twice as bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurupt Posted March 3, 2015 Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 (edited) He is plenty young enough to do that and we are talking about small sample size but he has been terrible so far. Anyone who craps on Pero should be destroying Payne twice as bad. Thats the thing with Payne: he isn´t a really young player. 4 years of College is the most experience you will get with a rookie unless you take a guy like Antić from Europe (who still has to adjust to the American game anyway). 24 years isn´t old, for sure. But it´s not like his game will make big leaps forward at that age. He shot poorly in Summer Lague play (37%) and he shoots poorly in Minnesota. 31% from the field as an athletic 6'10 guy is just bad. He is more of a face-up player and his shot just isn´t good enough to do that on the NBA level. Coupled with a putrid FGA to FTA ratio (8:1), his ability to score is just really bad for a PF and he doesn´t add much else except decent rebounding and the occasional block on defense. And there are tons of players that can do that better. Edited March 3, 2015 by kurupt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted March 3, 2015 Moderators Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 Thats the thing with Payne: he isn´t a really young player. 4 years of College is the most experience you will get with a rookie unless you take a guy like Antić from Europe (who still has to adjust to the American game anyway). 24 years isn´t old, for sure. But it´s not like his game will make big leaps forward at that age. He shot poorly in Summer Lague play (37%) and he shoots poorly in Minnesota. 31% from the field as an athletic 6'10 guy is just bad. He is more of a face-up player and his shot just isn´t good enough to do that on the NBA level. Coupled with a putrid FGA to FTA ratio (8:1), his ability to score is just really bad for a PF and he doesn´t add much else except decent rebounding and the occasional block on defense. And there are tons of players that can do that better. My theory - and I acknowledge that it is nothing more than my best guess - is that Bud / Ferry, et al. concluded that the screwed up with Payne and that he wasn't worth waiting on. I.e., that he was a bust and best to get value for him before he turns into our next Jenkins. I'm not really arguing with you, I am just acknowledging he is young enough to still make big leaps in his game. For example, Ben Wallace made his big improvements at a later age. Heck, Teague has made his big leap at age 26 (average at 23, to slightly better at 24, to middle-of-the-pack starting PG at age 25, to All-Star at age 26). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NBASupes Posted March 3, 2015 Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 My theory - and I acknowledge that it is nothing more than my best guess - is that Bud / Ferry, et al. concluded that the screwed up with Payne and that he wasn't worth waiting on. I.e., that he was a bust and best to get value for him before he turns into our next Jenkins. I'm not really arguing with you, I am just acknowledging he is young enough to still make big leaps in his game. For example, Ben Wallace made his big improvements at a later age. Heck, Teague has made his big leap at age 26 (average at 23, to slightly better at 24, to middle-of-the-pack starting PG at age 25, to All-Star at age 26). Jeff showed a great deal of talent out of college. Payne always looked like a role player at best type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted March 3, 2015 Moderators Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 Jeff showed a great deal of talent out of college. Payne always looked like a role player at best type. Obviously, Ferry didn't think so on draft day. I think he changed his mind but that is my speculation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 3, 2015 Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 My theory - and I acknowledge that it is nothing more than my best guess - is that Bud / Ferry, et al. concluded that the screwed up with Payne and that he wasn't worth waiting on. I.e., that he was a bust and best to get value for him before he turns into our next Jenkins. I'm not really arguing with you, I am just acknowledging he is young enough to still make big leaps in his game. For example, Ben Wallace made his big improvements at a later age. Heck, Teague has made his big leap at age 26 (average at 23, to slightly better at 24, to middle-of-the-pack starting PG at age 25, to All-Star at age 26). This is my thought as well. It has to be he just couldn't get the concepts. That doesn't mean he wont flourish in another system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NBASupes Posted March 3, 2015 Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 Obviously, Ferry didn't think so on draft day. I think he changed his mind but that is my speculation. Ferry been trying to get rid of Jeff for a hot minute. For many of the reasons I didn't want Jeff anymore. Obivously Jeff improved and if you noticed so did George Hill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 3, 2015 Report Share Posted March 3, 2015 JaVale McGeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee- shaq Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now