Jump to content
  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $390 of $700 target

Danny Ferry Uncut


JTB

Recommended Posts

BY THE WAY: those who thought they were so sure the ASG didnt give Ferry 100% power! You are very wrong as you read this interview, Danny sounds as if he will control this teams every decsion based off how surely he is when he answers specific questions. Also right out of Danny's mouth he says he wouldnt have come here if the hawks were going to be sold.....check it out!

blogs.ajc.com/hawks/2012/06/25/atlanta-hawks-danny-ferry-uncut/?cxntfid=blogs_hawks

Atlanta Hawks: Danny Ferry uncut

9:04 pm June 25, 2012, by Michael Cunningham

Some excerpts from Danny Ferry’s session with reporters following his introduction as Hawks GM.

From Ferry’s opening statement:

I was not looking to leave San Antonio. [Owner] Peter Holt, [coach] Gregg Popovich, [GM] R.C. Buford were incredible to me and my family. Obviously it’s a wonderful place to work.

But getting to know Bruce [Levenson] over the last several weeks made myself think and challenge myself whether this is the right thing to do. I was struck by his humble approach to the past [especially] for a team that has done well. There was a real sense of humility. I was really struck by his intensity, his focus, his energy about going toward the future and trying to build something from the ground up. This was critical to me to know that it can and will be done the right way.

Over the last four years, from 10,000 feet looking at it from San Antonio, this place has done pretty well. Rick [sund] is a big part of that, Larry [Drew] last year obviously was a big part of that. I am coming here to build on what they’ve done a good job with so far.

My approach coming here, to be clear, is to try to have a value-based identity with good guys that play hard, play together, share the ball [and[ that can be professional on the court. From a program standpoint, from an operation standpoint being progressive, being systematic in how we go about everything whether it's the draft, player development, medical, and so on. And then just a consistent commitment from us building inside out with a good, strong culture and a family atmosphere. Those are the things we will look at every day and hopefully we are doing a good job with it.

Q. How will things work with the draft?

A. "I've been working, just not for the Hawks. I've gone and seen games all year. I am somewhat prepared for the draft as it relates to where the San Antonio Spurs where at [No. 59] and the players we were looking at. My focus changes now with the pick in the first round that the Hawks have in the first round. [The current staff] have done a good job. I will sit in on the process, I will be a part of the process and ultimately will be a big part of making the decision and the things that happen here over the next week.”

Q. What can you bring from San Antonio that can help you here?

“San Antonio, first of all, had a committed ownership. The Holts were fantastic. My conversations with Bruce made me feel comfortable that’s very much where he is and his heart and time and energy are going to go into that going forward. Values-driven; there are good people there. ‘Popp,’ R.C., go down the list of players, that’s a good group of people and ultimately that gives you the best chance to succeed.

“A systematic approach; on the court, the Spurs play a certain way. Hopefully the Hawks will build an identity in that regard even more from where they are now. And then building with the right people in general. The front office, when you look at the people who have come through there—Sam Presti, Rob Hennigan now, R.C. . . .

“‘Popp’ and R.C. have built a good program there and obviously it’s something people are trying to emulate. I had the opportunity to build a program in Cleveland, something I was proud of. We had a lot of success. I’m looking forward to rolling up my sleeves. There are good things here. There are good players. They’ve had a succesful program. This has been a good program but also not something people are satisfied with here.”

Q. Why did you choose here instead of Philly?

“It would have been a great privilege working with Doug Collins. I think he’s a great basketball mind. . . . I got really comfortable with this opportunity as it relates to Bruce. What I get is a great sense of humility but also a sense of intense focus and passion and pride about what can happen here going forward, the resources, the willingness that made me excited about this opportunity.”

Q. This is a team that has been considered good but hasn’t been able to get over the hump. How can you get them there?

“This has been a good team. From the outside looking in, this has been a program that has been right there. I have my opinions from the outside but before I really answer I want to sit down with Rick and Larry. I don’t know all of the behind-the-scenes here. To be able to sit down with the two of those guys and really come up with where they think they are, I will be better able to answer that question. There are some good players. They’ve had some success. That’s one of the things I’m looking forward to.”

Q. What will Rick Sund’s role be?

A. “What we agreed with is let’s work together the next month [through] the draft, free agency, summer league. And really table the discussion until then as far as what he wants and what’s ultimately best for the organization.”

Q. Did you come in here with the expectation that you could make a change with the head coach?

“I look forward to working with Larry. We will have a lot of time together over the next month to really get to know each other. They did a nice job last year as a team. As we get to know each other, hopefully something I can help him with going forward is growing as a coach and he helping me grow as a professional, as well.”

Q. Are there any ‘untouchables’ on the roster?

“I’m here [only] a day. . . . At the end of the day we want to win a championship. At some point we will uncover every stone and look at everything. This group has had a lot of success. It’s a question of, can you go to the next level or are there opportunities? You have got to know what the opportunites are, as well. I think this is a good group of players that has done well.”

Q. This team is in a situation where it’s good but not championship-caliber, yet not bad enough to get high draft picks. With no cap space and lots of committed salaries, how can you improve the team in these circumstances?

“We have our draft choices going forward, first of all. That’s important going forward. We are not encumbered in any way. That being said, the discussions I’ve had with Bruce and the organization have been nothing about players necessarily so far. It’s been more about, ‘Are you willing to do this the right way? Are you willing to invest? There’s a lot of things that we’ll invest in that you won’t see. NBA teams are fragile. The NBA is hard. You invest in all of those things ultimately you put yourself in the best position to succeed. I got comfortable Bruce is in this for the right way and the right reasons and willing to do the things to build the best program to have a chance to succeed and not be fragile and be more successful than average.”

Q. Bruce said you had concerns about this franchise that had to be addressed. What were those concerns? Was it the stability of the ownership? The sale that fell through? The lawsuits they’ve had in the past?

“This organization, Rick has done a good job. It’s had its challenges to deal with: the lawsuit, the sale. That’s a tough thing for a team to deal with. They’ve done a good job, they really, have. From the outside looking in, they’ve been a successful team. I don’t think they are satisfied, and they shouldn’t be. I’m here to build on that success but I knew I need the tools and the ability to be able to build on that. How we build the road map, that’s the stuff we start to dig into now. What are the options? What is the right direction based off of those options? Those are all of the things, I’m fortunate to be able to work with Rick over the next month, hopefully more than that, and get to know Larry over the next month and really dissect what the opportunities are. Look, I’m not walking into this blindly. But [evaluating the roster] is not where my main focus was at the start of this thing.”

Q. Why did you leave Cleveland?

A. “My contract was up. We were on different pages as far as the future. The dynamics of ownership changed on some level. They had five great years in Cleveland. We had the best record the last couple years. We went to the finals. I think we are all proud of what we did. At the end of the day, we didn’t win a championship. That’s disappointing but I’m proud of the program we had there and proud of what we did. Chris [Grant] is the GM there because we did a good job. Lance Blanks, who worked for me, he’s the general manager in Phoenix. Michael Winger is the No. 2 guy in Oklahoma City. We had a good program and good people. We are looking forward to putting together a program here and watching it grow.

“I had a good thing in San Antonio. I would not have made the decision to come here if I didn’t think it was good opportunity and a good challenge. It’s not something that’s going to be built over the first week, it’s not something that’s going to be six months or even the first year. Hopefully over time you will see that we’ve built a program that’s really well run, well-organized and prepared to make the best decision we can make and hopefully make the best decision going forward.”

Q. There is a debate here core about whether it’s time to break up the core of players. Where do you stand on that?

A. “There is going to be debate around every team. There was debate over what to do in San Antonio, there was debate over what to do in Cleveland, there is debate over what to do with the Lakers right now. It’s part of this. At the end of the day we will look at all the possible road maps are there and make decisions and move in a direction and hopefully we do it while building a stronger program than what’s already here. Again, they’ve been pretty good. Teams are trying to get where the hawks have been the last few years. So I have to walk in there with a certain respect for that. I’m looking forward to building on that as many ways as we can.”

Q. Both you and Bruce mentioned analytics as an area in which you want to invest. Some teams have proprietary systems. Would that be something you would bring here?

“We are going to look at everything. But I am allowed to do everything. If that’s something that makes sense and come to them and say this is something I want to do, I’m very confident the answer is going to be yes. We are going to look at everything in how we can get better in the organization and what resources need to help make that happen. I’m very comfortable with Bruce’s commitment to do that.”

Q. How much do you use advanced statistics?

“I think you use everything you can. You throw the kitchen sink at things and then you make a decision.”

Q. Do you think the issue of selling team is off the table?

“I would not have come here if I thought that was an issue and if I didn’t feel comfortable with that. Bruce has made me comfortable that he’s in this for the long haul and he hopes I’m standing next to him 12 years from now.”

Q. Do you anticipate there will be changes on your basketball operations staff?

“I don’t think there is time to think about anything right now other than draft and free agency. I am sure there will be changes. Whether that just means addition or whether that means changes we will have to dig into that. Based on what they tell me that we are going to build more programs, I would think we will have a few more people working for us.”

Q. You said that you will be heavily involved in the draft preparation. Will the pick ultimately be your decision?

“Hopefully we can build consensus over what the right hing is. But ultimately I will be the one that will have to make that decision if we can’t come to a consensus.”

Q. You were already doing draft prep for San Antonio. Will it be a matter of comparing notes with the Hawks’ staff?

“Yeah but, granted, we were preparing for the 50th pick. When Manu [Ginobili] got hurt early in the year we looked at the lottery because we didn’t know what the hell was going to happen. I’ve been out watching college games throughout the year and studied [YouTube Clips] and done all of the things that we needed to do to prepare ourselves for the draft. For example, Kawhi Leonard we traded to get that draft pick. We traded to get George Hill.

“Do I know all of the guys that are going to be available at 23 like the back of my hand? No, but I know them pretty well. I will use the next few days to dig into those guys in particular. We will be looking at the whole draft because, who knows, maybe we do something else? We’ll see.”

Michael Cunningham, Hawks beat

Edited by JTB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

I was really struck by his intensity, his focus, his energy about going toward the future and trying to build something from the ground up. This was critical to me to know that it can and will be done the right way.

Trying to read between the standard answers for solid indicators. This would be one of them right here. I'm going to hold my tongue for the most part, but that doesn't sound like these cats are interested in keeping the status quo.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of these answers given by Ferry indicates that he indeed has much power:

"I will sit in on the process, I will be a part of the process and ultimately will be a big part of making the decision and the things that happen here over the next week.”“We are going to look at everything. But I am allowed to do everything. If that’s something that makes sense and come to them and say this is something I want to do, I’m very confident the answer is going to be yes. We are going to look at everything in how we can get better in the organization and what resources need to help make that happen. I’m very comfortable with Bruce’s commitment to do that.”I am sure there will be changes. Whether that just means addition or whether that means changes we will have to dig into that“Hopefully we can build consensus over what the right hing is. But ultimately I will be the one that will have to make that decision if we can’t come to a consensus.”

.........Thats right sqawkers! complete CONTROL. i am more excited about that than anything else of our new gm. for once the asg really hands it over to where the gm can have nearly all the power. this may not be the best thing but ferry has to have a better basketball iq and knowledge of building a team than the asg, i just hope he doesnt fail!

lol the asg is probably giving him 3 years to prove himself or maybe just a year and a half of having nearly 100% control!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, this is certainly a sign that the worm may have turned in dysfunctional ASG organization. I want this to be the case, but we'll have to see. Still, I'm excited by the hire and I have more hope for the future of this organziation than I've had in several years. Heck, at one point, I was actually worried the ASG might do a double screw and move the team out of Atlanta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone else find it interesting that Bruce Levenson seems to be the point man of the ownership group now? Prior to this, it was always Michael Gearon Jr. that seemd to take the lead on issues.

That's my exact thought as well was hearing Bruce this, Bruce that. Makes me wonder what the deal is with Jr that he's not the one being talked about.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

That's my exact thought as well was hearing Bruce this, Bruce that. Makes me wonder what the deal is with Jr that he's not the one being talked about.

Makes you wonder what the other owners thought about Gearon Jr's comments during the Celtics series. Maybe they felt he was doing more harm than good and Bruce told him to take a seat... Starting to like this ownership group even more. Edited by PSSSHHHRRR87
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now there's an image I could have lived without.

Glad I wasn't the only one here who unwillingly had that image burned into his brain.

Makes you wonder what the other owners thought about Gearon Jr's comments during the Celtics series. Maybe they felt he was doing more harm than good and Bruce told him to take a seat... Starting to like this ownership group even more.

Wouldn't that be a wonderful thing!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone else find it interesting that Bruce Levenson seems to be the point man of the ownership group now? Prior to this, it was always Michael Gearon Jr. that seemd to take the lead on issues.

Levenson has always been smarter, more eloquent, and more reasonable than Gearon. Gearon is totally delusional about where we are as a team, and how he and the team are perceived. That being said, I put little stock into the new hire saying the right things. Of course he's not going to come in and say "I'm a puppet", and of course the owners are going to sweet talk him to get him here. Time will tell whether there is any truth to this, and what authority he is really given when the time comes. I think that Levenson's love was always hockey, and Gearon's was basketball. For whatever reason, they invested nothing into the hockey team and it's gone. I can only hope that Levenson will take charge with the Thrashers gone and Gearon recently humiliated. I think he is smart enough to hire the right people and let them do the job, whereas Gearon thinks he's the smartest man in the room...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the Philly job out there on the table, I do not see Ferry taking this one unless he was sure he had at least equal amount of power here. I find it pretty amazing that we were able to beat out Philly with this hire. They, Levenson and the ASG, must have made a big commitment to him.

Edited by Buzzard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Levenson has always been smarter, more eloquent, and more reasonable than Gearon. Gearon is totally delusional about where we are as a team, and how he and the team are perceived. That being said, I put little stock into the new hire saying the right things. Of course he's not going to come in and say "I'm a puppet", and of course the owners are going to sweet talk him to get him here. Time will tell whether there is any truth to this, and what authority he is really given when the time comes.I think that Levenson's love was always hockey, and Gearon's was basketball. For whatever reason, they invested nothing into the hockey team and it's gone. I can only hope that Levenson will take charge with the Thrashers gone and Gearon recently humiliated. I think he is smart enough to hire the right people and let them do the job, whereas Gearon thinks he's the smartest man in the room...

honestly i dont see ferry acting as a puppet for the asg and if the asg really are just sweet talking him...im more than sure ferry would just step down! under contract or not! ferry is expecting full authority and the asg has said publicly that they have given it to himOne thing thats different about the ferry hiring is that i have never seen the asg as long as they have owned this team speak out publicly that they are giving 100% power to a gm until the ferry hire. i honestly think the asg is forreal for once and they do want to get better.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giving him a 6 year deal here is the key, IMO. I don't think Danny Ferry signs on a long term deal like this if he thinks there is a chance that he will be a puppet for the ownership group. Maybe I'm just optimistic, but I think the ownership group has turned a corner here. I think they have either fallen into a stream of cash flow that will help them run the team better or they have realized the need for a value based systematic approach that falls into line with their cash flow issues.What will be interesting to watch is how Danny Ferry will fill out his staff after the draft. He will lean on the incumbents through the draft, and a guy like Dave Pendergraft may get a chance to stay on as assistant GM, but I'm betting that Danny will increase the size of the scouting staff and will also add an analytics staff.Just as an aside, Danny Ferry has quite possibly played for four of the best basketball coaches that have ever coached. He played for Morgan Wooten in high school, Mike Krzyzewski in college, and both Lenny Wilkens and Gregg Popovich in the NBA. He also played for Mike Fratello, and I'm curious to see if Fratello may end up being a bridge coach for Ferry at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...