Admin capstone21 Posted November 13, 2012 Admin Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 He should no longer be called Smoove (which I have never called him btw) but instead 'Brick'Brick will be how I refer to him for now on until he earns a new nickname Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Atlantaholic Posted November 13, 2012 Premium Member Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 The nickname "Smoove" is sheer irony at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruhman91 Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 Never understood how he got the name Smoove,his game is far from it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AHawks89 Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 A thread like this after he was voted player of the game? I wonder some times.. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin capstone21 Posted November 13, 2012 Author Admin Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 I thought brick had a good first half especially the first quarter (he was like 5 -6) but after that he was taking terrible jumpers instead of taking it inside...and some of those jumpers were at in opportune times. He shouldn't be allowed to take a shot from outside 8 feet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaceRam Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 I thought I read on the box score that he didn't take any 3 point shots (attempts) tonight. I was pretty impressed (encouraged) with seeing that stat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AHawks89 Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 I think it was that Al Horford thread that made you feel like doing this. But anyways, you should be giving him props instead of taking another jab at him. He's out there playing sick with the stomach flue and put up 19 11 3. More like Kudo's to Smoove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin capstone21 Posted November 13, 2012 Author Admin Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 I thought I read on the box score that he didn't take any 3 point shots (attempts) tonight. I was pretty impressed (encouraged) with seeing that stat! He bricked A LOT of long twos,..and he was fading away while taking them too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimsey Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 He tends to take those jumpers when he's tired or offense has been stagnant. Drew needs to take him out during that span. Gutty all around performance imo. although Portland has the worst bench ever assembled. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
High5 Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 You need to draw iron for it to be a brick. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaceRam Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 I guess the stat sheet was a little misleading. Like many other Hawk fans I think if Josh Smith would take less (a lot less!) long range outside shots he could be awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member BrazilianHawk Posted November 13, 2012 Premium Member Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 Josh was out of control late in the game, his 4th quarter was atrocious. He just isn't a go-to guy and shouldn't be allowed to act like one. Other than that he was OK.Horford still needs more shots. Our winning run started with two cold-blooded baskets by Horf in the paint. We should play through him in close games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViperXX79 Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 It's hilarious that someone like Smith can go 9-22 taking horrible shots yet some people think that's awesome and somehow superstar worthy. Marvin could score 20 points if he was allowed to shoot that much. Hell he'd probably get more considering he at least has some kind of mid range game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrReality Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 I'm on with Brick 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 You need to draw iron for it to be a brick. I'll go with Brick, but "Air Smoove" might be more accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CroHawk Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 Air Brick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators AHF Posted November 13, 2012 Moderators Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 (edited) I think "The Mason" would be more clever than "Brick," but the timing isn't great in either case since Josh was key to us winning a game when he was under the weather to begin with. Edited November 13, 2012 by AHF 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DatWerkk Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 Seems Squawker negativity breeds Hawk success. First Korver, then Horford, now Smoove.Too bad it ain't working for LD or Tolliver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YP2K Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 Josh was out of control late in the game, his 4th quarter was atrocious. He just isn't a go-to guy and shouldn't be allowed to act like one. Other than that he was OK. Horford still needs more shots. Our winning run started with two cold-blooded baskets by Horf in the paint. We should play through him in close games. You are blinded by your hatred of Josh Smith... Josh wasn't even in the game for the first half of the 4th quarter. We blew a good lead without him. And those "cold-blooded baskets by Horf" were set up by Josh Smith assists. So, how do they prove we should play through Horford when those baskets were not setup by playing through him? A big part of winning that game was Josh Smith's defense and assists during the 2nd half of the 4th quarter. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin capstone21 Posted November 13, 2012 Author Admin Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 You are blinded by your hatred of Josh Smith... Josh wasn't even in the game for the first half of the 4th quarter. We blew a good lead without him. And those "cold-blooded baskets by Horf" were set up by Josh Smith assists. So, how do they prove we should play through Horford when those baskets were not setup by playing through him? A big part of winning that game was Josh Smith's defense and assists during the 2nd half of the 4th quarter. His jump shot is still terrible and are bricks...if he would stay near the basket he would avg around 20 and his FG% would be above .500. He shot something like 4 - 14 after his initial start to the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now