Premium Member Diesel Posted July 10, 2013 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 If Milwaukee signs Teague to an offer sheet, I believe that Ferry has no problem with signing Mo Williams. And more than likely Mo will wait to hear about Bynum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member sturt Posted July 10, 2013 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Yep... and I read something about Mo being on the radar screen about this time last week, I believe... so I'm not so certain that he is Plan C... he might've been Plan A, but just awaiting what happens with the poker chip called Jeff Teague to happen. Personally, I hate to see it... nothing against Mo, but just still feeling overall positive about Teague's future. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Couldn't we at least get some picks for Teague? For a guy that wants to stock up on assets Ferry sure does seem willing to just let players walk. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyCASH Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 only way this makes since Danny and co are for certain that Dennis is the futue and sign Mo to a 1-2 yr deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flight Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 I'd take any of the Teague-BJ-Monta three over Mo smh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plskeepbibby Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Mo Williams, meh. Teague or Jennings for me and IMO the writing is on the wall for Teague so it better be Jennings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTB Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Mo shouldn't be a option! It's either Teague, Ellis or Jennings. Ferry knows what's up, if we sign mo over any of those guys ferry should and will be laughed at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted July 10, 2013 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 (edited) I'd take any of the Teague-BJ-Monta three over Mo smh. I think Mo would be a cheap pickup that would allow us to develop more players. Plus, in the playoffs, he may help against Lebron. Through his cheapness, I think he may allow us to get Bynum and somebody like Brewer. Edited July 10, 2013 by Diesel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Mo is about as good as Bibs was when he first got here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benhillboy Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 (edited) Looking at his numbers from last season he's a little better than I thought, but still, hell to the naw. I fault pretty much everyone on that team for failing to make the playoffs last year without any major injuries while the Lakers were so pathetic. In their defense, they did have Marvin on the roster but still. That's what made me say "eh" at the Milsap signing. I'd probably covet Hayward most form their 12-13 roster as far as we're concerned. Edited July 10, 2013 by benhillboy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameTime Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Mo is about as good as Bibs was when he first got here. Is Jennings even at that level now though? Mo is even a better shooter than Jennings. I'm not sure if Jennings is worth 8-9 more mill a year when we already have our "potential future" in Dennis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted July 10, 2013 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Looking at his numbers from last season he's a little better than I thought, but still, hell to the naw. I fault pretty much everyone on that team for failing to make the playoffs last year without any major injuries while the Lakers were so pathetic. In their defense, they did have Marvin on the roster but still. That's what made me say "eh" at the Milsap signing. I'd probably covet Haywood most form their 12-13 roster as far as we're concerned. I think Mo is more of a PG than any of the guys we're looking at. He can score. He can run the Pick and Roll. He's experienced. If a Teague deal fails. IF we do get Bynum. We may be able to get Mo... and get another SG prospect. I said Brewer, but it may be somebody who can actually shoot. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 So Mo is another Jazz player. What are we trying for - to become the Atlanta Jazz? Now I'm wondering why we didn't get Jefferson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted July 10, 2013 Author Premium Member Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 The real question is (In my Hulk Hogan Voice) Whachagonna do with LOU??So Mo is another Jazz player. What are we trying for - to become the Atlanta Jazz? Now I'm wondering why we didn't get Jefferson. I think Charlotte jumped on him too fast. I betcha he was in our plans though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrNique Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 I think Mo would be a cheap pickup that would allow us to develop more players. Plus, in the playoffs, he may help against Lebron. Through his cheapness, I think he may allow us to get Bynum and somebody like Brewer.What you say here would definitely be the upside. Cheaper and would maybe agree to the 1-2 year contract. But just not the type of PG I want. My rankings with Mo added, like this:TeagueJenningsMoEllis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member sturt Posted July 10, 2013 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Danny essentially said during the presser today that the SA model is actually the Utah model... which is an observation I had awhile back... SA has been Utah, except with a Hall of Famer in the post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GameTime Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Danny essentially said during the presser today that the SA model is actually the Utah model... which is an observation I had awhile back... SA has been Utah, except with a Hall of Famer in the post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member sturt Posted July 10, 2013 Premium Member Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Well, yeah... I should have added... "recently." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawk88 Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Playing the Mo Williams chip will lower the price for Jennings. Mo Williams also let's us move Schröder into the lineup as quickly as possible.I don't see Teague, Jennings or Ellis leading a team to a championship. Teague is good, I just don't think he is good enough to get you to the playoffs. I'm just not to sure how far he can get you. We have to hope Schröder will be the answer in 3-4 years.Hawk88 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawk88 Posted July 10, 2013 Report Share Posted July 10, 2013 Playing the Mo Williams chip will lower the price for Jennings. Mo Williams also let's us move Schröder into the lineup as quickly as possible.I don't see Teague, Jennings or Ellis leading a team to a championship. Teague is good, I just don't think he is good enough to get you to the playoffs. I'm just not to sure how far he can get you. We have to hope Schröder will be the answer in 3-4 years.Hawk88I mistyped. Teague will get you to the playoffs, just not far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now