Official Game Thread: Hawks at Lakers

[kg01]

1 hour ago, macdaddy said:

On a team full of rookies, inexperienced players, and newbies i think not having Vince available is something that is being overlooked.

I was pontificating on this very subject whilst lounging on the veranda.

The team's energy/effort were questionable at multiple times the last 2-3 games but it Could just be road weariness?

Is this a double-secret suspension not so conspicuously following another suspension?

Hope not but I also hope it's not something serious on a personal level for him.

My mind's gone right now.  These losses man.

[Spud2nique]

4 hours ago, kg01 said:

I was pontificating

Hurt yourself? 
 

oh comon I made you  

[Watchman]

On 11/18/2019 at 3:44 PM, JayBirdHawk said:

5+ years of experience for that team's starting line up.  Len is/was the longest tenured of the starters

 

 

1. La La teams are better. 

2. We are a young inexperienced team.

3. back to back, tail end of a 5 game roadie.

 

I advocated for Vince starting after the JC suspension.  My reasoning:

1. I preferred Parker off the bench to keep the bench unit intact and especially since his defense is so bad.

2. I think Vince would be able to help our rookies more during games, Parker can't

3. As old as Vince is, I trust him for his defense and to make the right plays.

But, alas - he wasn't available...so moot at this time.

LA teams (Lakers at least) may be better than Denver, but not that much better.