Jump to content
  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $390 of $700 target

Our blueprint should be Phoenix instead of Detroit


Rexhawk

Recommended Posts

The problem with this team is that Woodson was brought in to replicate the detroit team. We do not have the big men to run that type of offense. Detroit has Rasheed and Big Ben in the post. We have a finesse power forward in ZaZa.

We should run an offense similar to Phoenix. The hawks strength this year is their transition game which allows them to hit their open shooters in JJ and Salim. Phoenix has the same type of athletic player. The difference is that their offense is utilizing their talent.

I know that a lot of people think that Steve Nash is the key, but the Phoenix pushes the ball and creates offense when Steve is on the bench.

The bottom line is that no one plays defense in the NBA. BK needs to find a coach with an offense philosophy to better utilize the hawk's talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

you don't just say "we're going to build like detroit or phoenix". It doesn't work that way. There simply is no set formula that will get you wins. A collection of players that works on a high level is a special thing. You don't simply say "lets get a few defensive bigs and emulate detroit" becuase it will fail 99 times out of 100.

Phoenix on the other hand is based entirely off of Steve Nash. Everything they do is a result of the leadership and tempo he sets. When he's on the bench, they still play as if he was out there. THey just modify the roles a little. If we had a player like him. We could definitely play their style. Whether or not we would have the same results is another story. But we could play that way.

We could have had a Steve Nash caliber player, at least one who was more advanced at the same level, had we drafted Chris Paul. Sadly we went for potential over proven results AND potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chillz, I have night terrors over just how good this team could be with Paul or even a slghtly less good young Pg like Deron Williams running the show. Paul especially though. I would have even been wrong to select Bogut over him as it stands now.

W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Hawks are one of the worst in the league in turning the ball over. Their fast breaks have been a comedy of errors.

Woody has the philosophy that whoever gets the defensive rebound should bring the ball up the court. Most teams immediately look for the pg to run the break. Woodys hairbrained scheme leads to a lot of wasted opportunities and turnovers.

The Hawks don't have the ball handlers to run like the Suns do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agreed. We have the youth to be a running team, but we don't have the PG. Neither Lue nor Ivey really push the ball, and JJ never even thinks about it. If we could get a speedy PG in here, he could do damage with the Joshes and Marvin. Of course that requires getting defensive stops too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:


We could have had a Steve Nash caliber player, at least one who was more advanced at the same level, had we drafted Chris Paul. Sadly we went for potential over proven results AND potential.


Pretty much says it all. Marvin is going to have to (1) put up some pretty gaudy statistics in a year or two and (2) make a contribution to the team that results i wins before I can give BK a lick of credit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

My sentiments exactly Duff_Man. Nash played on some good teams at Dallas with this style and how close did they come to a championship? So what do they do with Nash gone? Get a REAL defensive minded coach in there and now they have the best record in the west.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I like Paul I still think some of you are overrating him. Our offense is better than theirs. We score more points and shoot a better percentage. The only advantage they have is fewer turnovers for obvious reasons.

The big difference between NO and Atlanta is that they give up about 8 fewer ppg.

If Paul was here we would be scoring more and turning it over less but the defense would still be weak, although I am sure he is a better defender than Lue and Salim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

you tend to focus on an improved defensive effort, as if it is the fix-all for this team. It certainly would help. But this team has a LOT of problems. Chris Paul would fix every one of them EXCEPT for defense and he would likely improve that as well. As he is a vastly superior defensive PG compared to the other guys we have.

So I don't think it's overrating him at all. You can't really over rate a rookie who is putting up top-5 league wide PG stats. He is the primary reason why they are as good as they are and he is the primary reason why guys like David West are getting props for their improved play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...