How does Jeff Teague do in another system where he is let loose?

[Lurker]

**Spinoff thread alert!**

My opinion: He puts up 18 PTS and 7 AST on 44% FG/34% 3PT/85% FT. Which proves to people like me that he's a GOOD player, not great and not your 2nd best player on a championship contending team, 3rd best at most.

The problem with this team is they have three third options.

Edited May 22, 2016 by Lurker

[bumpyphish1]

Lower FG%, lower A/T ratio, less efficient.

[Hawkmoor]

pg teague

sg aflalo

sf anthony

pf porzingis

c lopez

That lineup is better than the Hawks.....................

Edited May 22, 2016 by Hawkmoor

[NBASupes]

5 minutes ago, bumpyphish1 said:

Lower FG%, lower A/T ratio, less efficient.

While scoring more, more assists and more national accolades due to his team winning far more than the season before.

Jeff is Jeff but like Mack, you gonna see his numbers completely go up just by him not being a part of a system like this one where you completely sacrifice your stats.

[skimaskway23]

1 hour ago, NBASupes said:

While scoring more, more assists and more national accolades due to his team winning far more than the season before.

Jeff is Jeff but like Mack, you gonna see his numbers completely go up just by him not being a part of a system like this one where you completely sacrifice your stats.

Same way I feel about horford. These guys sacrifice a lot. Teague could avg 20 and Horford #s don't look pretty but he is giving you 20 and 10 type performance. 

[BigDog90]

He'd be solid in a D'Antoni offense.

[benhillboy]

Pretty much the same with worse three point shooting.  His days of stepping up his ethic due to a strong mentor or coach are over.