Collins to be traded?

[bleachkit]

8 hours ago, TheNorthCydeRises said:

I think a better question is . . why wouldn't you give him the max?

To save money so we can pay other guys down the road. 

[JayBirdHawk]

13 minutes ago, bleachkit said:

To save money so we can pay other guys down the road. 

Like.......?

[bleachkit]

14 minutes ago, JayBirdHawk said:

Like.......?

Giannis and Trae of course.

[kg01]

23 minutes ago, bleachkit said:

Giannis and Trae of course.

We can afford all 3, if we want to.  And why wouldn't we want to?

[JayBirdHawk]

1 hour ago, bleachkit said:

Giannis and Trae of course.

Signing John now or next offseason doesn't limit our ability to sign them both, his caphold is $12 million next season. Unless TS does something really crazy this FA offseason and tie up all of our available capspace for the next 3 years.

[Duff_Man]

I am really tired of the "Hawks will give up great players for basically nothing" gimmick.

[kg01]

34 minutes ago, Duff_Man said:

I am really tired of the "Hawks will give up great players for basically nothing" gimmick.

Yep.

I'm also tired of the "Hawks develop really good player then give him up because they're cheap AF".

Folks want us to be like the dude who turns down the super model because she has a freckle on her elbow.

[TRW]

Give John Collins the max or something close to it. Unless we trade him for a Giannis, AD, or a boatload of good players and picks.