johnnyde Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 I'm thinking pure speculatin in this guy's part, but oh well. http://www.nba.com/pacers/news/question_040716.html BTW, credit goes to poster on RealGM Hawks board for finding this info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzard Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 If it happens, I have to guess Billy does think as much of Dampier as Jerry West. I hope he is right and all the thinking (my opinion as well) he was playing for a contract is wrong. We will see . . . no doubt we need a big man and we do have the money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packfill Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 I just hope West isn't trying to bait someone else into giving him big money. I doubt Billy would fall for something like that though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jezmund Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 I wouldn't mind picking him up for a maximum of 3 years. Just so his # is off our books when it is time to resign Chill/Smith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDude Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 9 mill per scares me...i really think dampier is just an ok big body to grab rebounds.. i guess with all the overpaying this summer though, it wouldn't be TOO bad to overpay for rebounding... oh well, i gotta trust billy on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTFan31 Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 Yes we have to all trust Billy. I mean so far the guy hasnt called a bad shot yet, although he could of probably gotten a 1st round pick in that blazers trade. I would like to get Dampier, he is huge, grab rebounds, can block shots and has some inside presence on the offensive end. Signing him and signing Pryz can be a huge lift for us, we will be huge in the center position. 2 guys that can rebound very well and block shots. I wonder if we are still gonna pursue Mihm. If we do sign Dampier at 9mil per, how much money do we have in cap left? any know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin capstone21 Posted July 18, 2004 Admin Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 I would rather spend that money on a young player with the potential to be an all star like J. Crawford. Sign Crawford which solidifies our backcourt (imagine him and JT together) and then sign Prys to 1.5 million. JT/Best Crawford/JSmooth/Hansen Diaw/CC/SMith Harrington/Hendu Prys/Collier This is a much stronger team then having Dampier. Next year when Hendu and CC come off the books we can go after a center or PF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jezmund Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 I have to say the idea of giving Mihm a long-term deal at $5 million scares me more than signing Dampier. Mihm is soft and just doesn't offer us anything. He is no better than Collier IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB21 Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 Why spend money on a player that shoots a poor percentage from the field and doesn't play any defense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f_town Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 i hear alot how Dampier has only played great during contract years... what about the intervening years...did he just not seem to care at all or he just wasnt in peak condition or what just curious to hear opinions...i know squat about the Warriors' players...hehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB21 Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 It had more to do with injuries than his desire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OGRat Posted July 19, 2004 Report Share Posted July 19, 2004 Any idea how he is in the locker room? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beav Posted July 19, 2004 Report Share Posted July 19, 2004 I lived in the bay area for a few years and saw quite a few Warriors games. Dampier was injured a ton my two years there. My impression (while I only watched GS about 6-10 times a year the last few years) lately is that he is a solid player. He is big and has extremely long arms and is a good defender. Offensively he is serviceable. I think that my question about him has pretty much been desire. He seems to have that Sam Perkins like demeanor that makes him seem like he is kind of sleepwalking. I realize that does not mean that he doesn't play hard but he has always just given me the impression that he could do more. Maybe the right coach and situation can make him a better player. I will tell you this... if Adonal Foyle is getting 8 mil per year then Dampier at nine is a steal. Foyle pretty much stinks. As far as the locker room I never remember hearing anything negative, but never anything about any leadership skills either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB21 Posted July 19, 2004 Report Share Posted July 19, 2004 He was great for us at Mississippi State when he lead us to the final four in 1996. I don't know about him in the pros, but at MSU, he was a leader on the team. The guy worked his butt off and was one of the best defenders in basketball. He just had the hardest pair of hands on the planet and couldn't catch a pass unless it was bounced to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHORO44 Posted July 19, 2004 Report Share Posted July 19, 2004 He still has those hands of stone. I'd rather sign Vlade than Damp at 9 million over six. Quote: He was great for us at Mississippi State when he lead us to the final four in 1996. I don't know about him in the pros, but at MSU, he was a leader on the team. The guy worked his butt off and was one of the best defenders in basketball. He just had the hardest pair of hands on the planet and couldn't catch a pass unless it was bounced to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted July 19, 2004 Report Share Posted July 19, 2004 I'd offer him 3 years at 7 million and no more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted July 19, 2004 Report Share Posted July 19, 2004 Ok well given the contract offered to him already you're basically saying don't even bother talking to him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted July 19, 2004 Report Share Posted July 19, 2004 I'd rather have offered Kenyon the Max than offer ED 9 million per year. If the Hawks sign any vets it needs to be leaders. And ED is not one of those guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lascar78 Posted July 19, 2004 Report Share Posted July 19, 2004 I'm not disagreeing. All I'm getting at is that we know he's got 9 mil per season on the table. So there's no point discussing anything less. Either he's worth 9 or he's not. If he's not, there's no point discussing if he's worth 8 mil, 7 mil or 6 mil, we're just letting him go to NY. And that would be fine by me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now