Jump to content
  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $390 of $700 target

Chad Ford Strikes Again...


KalEl

Recommended Posts

We're all the way at the bottom

---------------------------------------------------

A few weeks ago we documented what has become a lethargic offseason. While a number of teams have been busy, only two -- the Bulls and Hornets -- have done enough to give themselves a major boost in the playoff hunt next year.

The Pacers will join that group if they finally close on the Al Harrington deal with the Hawks. Sources say a deal is close and awaiting approval from Pacers owner Herb Simon. It's hard to fathom that Simon will pass on an opportunity to get Harrington at a below-market-value deal while giving up only a first-round pick in return.

What's interesting to me is the fact that so many bad teams did little to improve themselves this summer. A few, like the Blazers and Raptors, had significant movement. While I don't think it will be enough to push either into the playoffs, at least they can tell fans they're trying.

On the other hand, how do the advertising whizzes for the Sixers, Warriors, Knicks, Sonics and Hawks sell their fans on next season?

"Wait 'til '08!" doesn't sound like a slogan that's going to sell a lot of season tickets.

Here's a look at five lottery teams that have remained surprisingly quiet this offseason.

Philadelphia 76ers

The Sixers are the most surprising of the 2006 offseason underachievers. They're coming off a disappointing lottery appearance. They own the fourth-highest payroll in the league. Allen Iverson looks like he already has his bags packed. They even have legit trade bait in Iverson and Samuel Dalembert.

Everyone thought the team was in for a radical overhaul.

And what have they done? They let John Salmons walk away and then signed Willie Green, coming off a season-long injury, to an overpriced deal.

Ugh. That's it, Sixers fans.

The fact that GM Billy King backed away from trading Iverson probably says more about Iverson's trade value than it does about Philly's resolve to change. The Sixers just didn't get the offers they were hoping for and don't seem to want to go into full rebuilding mode.

So what can Sixers fans look forward to this year?

While almost every team in the Atlantic Division improved modestly, the Sixers have nowhere to go but down. Look for them to battle the Knicks for the worst record in the Atlantic.

Golden State Warriors

After killing the Warriors for years, I got on the bandwagon last fall and predicted that Golden State would break the longest playoff drought in the league. Baron Davis and Jason Richardson gave them one of the most promising backcourts in the league. Warriors VP Chris Mullin was raving about Mike Dunleavy's improvement over the summer and eventually signed him to a substantial $45 million extension. Troy Murphy was healthy. Ike Diogu was supposed to add rebounding and toughness in the paint.

But once January hit, the wheels came off. The Warriors were 17-14 on December 31, but went 3-9 in January and never recovered. By the end of the season, the team had won just 34 games, duplicating their miserable 2004-05 outing. Losing Baron Davis for 28 games was part of the problem, but the truth is that the Warriors were just 23-31 when he played.

The last month was ugly. They endured a nine-game losing streak that stretched from March into April. It appeared that several players had quit. According to one player on the team, the tension between some players on the team and head coach Mike Montgomery was combustible.

Mullin went into the summer vowing to change the team's chemistry around, but three months later . . . the Warriors look the same.

Mullin has been working the phones all summer but has very little to show for it. He did manage to move Derek Fisher's hard-to-trade contract, but he got nothing but future salary cap relief in return.

The free agent market has been unkind. The team made a major push for Al Harrington, but the Hawks didn't want the bloated contract of Troy Murphy or Mike Dunleavy in return.

The Warriors' problem is that they continue to remain on the fence between winning and development. As always, they have a number of talented young players (Monta Ellis, Mickael Pietrus, Andris Biedrins, Diogu and rookie Patrick O'Bryant) in the pipeline. They don't want to trade them.

However, their veterans, with the exception of Jason Richardson, are virtually untradeable. Mullin is guilty for most of the bad contracts. He vastly overpaid Murphy, Dunleavy and Adonal Foyle, limiting his ability to make changes to his team. A number of GMs have told me they've been offered all three, but no one will touch them. The word around the league is that Davis is also available, but given his injury history and rep as a chemistry killer, no one will touch him.

If the Warriors can't trade the millstones that are dragging them down (those four are still owed a combined $182 million over the course of their Golden State careers) and refuse to trade the young talent that can't get them anywhere yet, then Warriors fans can rest assured that another 30-to-35-win season is coming.

New York Knicks

Last year the Knicks played for the right to hand the Bulls the No. 2 pick in the draft. Isiah Thomas still argues that he'd take Eddy Curry over who the Bulls got -- Tyrus Thomas -- any day. We'll see if the feels the same way once he's forced to hand over the Knicks' first-round pick to the Bulls again next summer.

If the Bulls hit the jackpot with the Knicks' No. 1 pick (and the right to draft Greg Oden), there could be a riot in New York.

As it stands, the Knicks' biggest offseason change is at coach. Larry Brown, the Knicks' savior this time last year, is out. Isiah Thomas, the Knicks' master architect, is in. I actually think the Knicks will be better with Isiah at the helm.

Brown sabotaged the team, in my opinion, to convince James Dolan that the roster needed a major overhaul. Thomas wasn't going to agree with Brown's assessment of Isiah's roster, so Brown dramatized the problems for Dolan.

Brown used 42 different starting lineups, an NBA record, last year in New York. Everyone was confused. No one knew where they stood. You could start one game and get a DNP the next. It was a mess.

With Thomas fighting for his professional life, things will be different. The Knicks do have talent and he'll lean heavily on Stephon Marbury, Steve Francis, Jamal Crawford, Eddy Curry and probably Channing Frye to save his job.

The Knicks, with a steadier hand at the helm, will probably win 10 more games next season.

However, the rest of their summer has been anticlimactic by comparison. The Knicks did land Jared Jeffries in free agency, but I'm not a big fan. He's long and he hustles and since he doesn't shoot the ball, he'll actually be popular with all of the Knicks' gunners. But I don't think he wins New York any extra games. Ditto for rookies Renaldo Balkman and Mardy Collins, who likely won't see the light of day this year.

Surprisingly, the Knicks have restrained themselves from being more aggressive. Jalen Rose and Maurice Taylor are both very tradeable because they are in the last year of their contracts. Nate Robinson and David Lee have trade value as well.

But the word out of New York is that Isiah has no choice but to play the hand he's dealt. Dolan apparently isn't in the mood to swap any more expiring contracts for long-term deals. The Knicks' payroll is at an absurd $122 million this year.

Thomas fought for every one of the players on his roster. Now he'll find out whether they were worth fighting for. If this were a fantasy team, the answer may be yes. But as an NBA team, the Knicks' long-term future still looks very bleak.

Seattle SuperSonics

The team was everyone's darling in 2004-05 but reverted to form last season. The Sonics showed they could still light it up offensively, but so could every team that played against them.

This year, uncertainty surrounding the sale of the franchise has the potential to add to their woes. While the team did sign restricted free agent Chris Wilcox to a three-year deal on Tuesday, Mickael Gelabale, last year's second-round draft pick, is the only major addition to the club so far.

It's difficult to see what the long-term strategy in Seattle is. For this team to be a serious playoff contender, players like Wilcox, Luke Ridnour, Robert Swift, Johan Petro, Mouhamed Saer Sene and Gelebale are going to have to play over the heads.

If the team fails again, there's a good likelihood that potential free agent Rashard Lewis will bolt for greener pastures next summer. That leaves the team with a number of promising young players and an aging Ray Allen.

I know most Sonics fans quit caring when Gary Payton was shipped out of town. For the dozen or so that are left, it may be time to retire those jerseys.

Atlanta Hawks

What is Billy Knight doing?

That's been a key question in the NBA for the past several summers.

An ownership feud lies at the heart of much of the Hawks' inability to get things done this summer, but even that has to be contextualized. The feud began, in large part, over the performance of Knight. Steve Belkin thought Knight was killing the franchise and disagreed vehemently over giving up so many assets for the right to give Joe Johnson a max deal. The rest of the Hawks owners disagreed and a year later, they're still in court shouting it out.

In the meantime, the Hawks' hands have basically been tied. (Were Johnson and Knight really worth all of this?)

The drafting of Shelden Williams signaled that the Hawks were serious about getting a player who could help them now. But after watching Williams' miserable performance in the summer league, there are now serious questions about how NBA ready he really is.

They did throw a lot of money this summer at Speedy Claxton (a diminutive, oft-injured scoring guard in a point guard's body) and plan on giving Lorenzen Wright (a 30-year-old center who averaged 5 points and 5 rebounds last season) a two-year deal when they trade Al Harrington. Neither move will push them far out of the basement of the East.

Yes, expected improvements by Josh Smith, Josh Childress and Marvin Williams should help, but all of that will be offset by losing Harrington, the team's second-leading scorer and only real inside presence.

Maybe next year, when the Hawks' ownership question is answered, the Hawks will finally be able to rise out of the rubble. But this year? Pray for Greg Oden.

Chad Ford covers the NBA for ESPN Insider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

look at it from Ford's perspective.

The Hawks are a mess. nothing he said wasn't true. he's just saying what others are thinking outside of Atlanta.

after listening to the Indy radio station interview a local media type on the Harrington situation yesterday I realized that most people outside of Atlanta really don't know what's going on with the team. why would they? since when did the Hawks become interesting to anyone besides us?

Chad Ford is not the problem. the Hawks will continue to get bad publicity until they start doing positive things, first and foremost being winning basketball games.

I don't hate on Chad Ford. I put the onus on the Hawks organization from the ownership to the management to the coaches on down to the players to show him he's been wrong about them. It's up to them to right the ship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. If we win 35+ this upcoming year he will be singing praise for the team. It's happened plenty of times before with other teams. The truth is that it is safer for a sports writer to down the Hawks than it is for them to say we may make a run at the playoffs. If he went around saying things like that, he probably wouldn't have a job for long (unless he happened to be always be right). Worse case scenario for him, we win 45 games (which I know we won't) and he will be proven wrong. But everyone will be proven wrong in that case and he won't look any worse for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and if he does start showing the Hawks some major love what will we get out of it? other than a little justification for sticking around as fans the past couple of years nothing, which is precisely what we're getting out of the negativity.

take the opinion makers for what they give us, simply opinions. they just have a little bigger stage than we do wink.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of that BS he said was negative!

He said how miserable Shelden played in summer league but he didn't say that Marvin was Mvp of summer league.

He just said that Mrvin Smoove and Chill will improve a little bit.

and he doesn't know how easy is to replace Al's offense and how miserable his defense was.

nothing positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Do you notice how Chad makes it seem like everything would be hunky-dorry between Belkin and the AS if it weren't for that bumbling BK? That is where things are getting personal from my perspective. Criticizing BK's moves are one thing but it is crystal clear that Belkin and the AS disagreed over almost everything. Does he blame BK for why Belkin fought the other owners to reduce the Thrashers payroll? Does he really think that but for the JJ trade everything would be great among the ownership?

The best thing I can say about that analysis is that at least he didn't call BK Billy King.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:


Do you notice how Chad makes it seem like everything would be hunky-dorry between Belkin and the AS if it weren't for that bumbling BK? That is where things are getting personal from my perspective. Criticizing BK's moves are one thing but it is crystal clear that Belkin and the AS disagreed over almost everything. Does he blame BK for why Belkin fought the other owners to reduce the Thrashers payroll? Does he really think that but for the JJ trade everything would be great among the ownership?

The best thing I can say about that analysis is that at least he didn't call BK Billy King.


Agree, that's what i am trying to say.

First thing he said was "what is BK doing".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's the same as always: Chad has an unmovable opinion that everything the Hawks or BK do is wrong and then he goes out and tries to use some knowledge to make his conclusion sound logical...as i've said before, his facts are based on his conclusion and not the other way around...

moron...guy still dissing the joe johnson trade...hasnt even made an attempt to understand where those picks would lie and who we got in theprocess..

HEY CHAD, LEARN SOMETHING DIFFERENT INSTEAD REHASHING YOUR OLD ARTICLES ABOUT THE HAWKS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Quote:


look at it from Ford's perspective.

The Hawks are a mess. nothing he said wasn't true. he's just saying what others are thinking outside of Atlanta.

after listening to the Indy radio station interview a local media type on the Harrington situation yesterday I realized that most people outside of Atlanta really don't know what's going on with the team. why would they? since when did the Hawks become interesting to anyone besides us?

Chad Ford is not the problem. the Hawks will continue to get bad publicity until they start doing positive things, first and foremost being winning basketball games.

I don't hate on Chad Ford. I put the onus on the Hawks organization from the ownership to the management to the coaches on down to the players to show him he's been wrong about them. It's up to them to right the ship.


You've hit the nail on the head! I agree 1000%. What else can be said??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. I don't think the JJ trade caused the problems, a difference in philosophies that would have come out sooner or later did. It's like saying a marriage failed because of one day when the girl went out and spent too much money shopping. JJ did not create these problems they were already there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Quote:


He does pose an good question, though. Was JJ worth putting the franchise in the fractured state it is now in?


It not a good question because it poses a false dilemma. It is akin to asking, "is unrest in the Middle East really worth the lives of two kidnapped soliders" as if there wasn't already rampant conflict between Israel and Hezbollah and the latest conflict was the sole product of the kidnapping. The JJ move was the straw that broke the camel's back. If the JJ move didn't happen, the same fracturing would have happened with something else because there were ongoing conflicts with Belkin and he wanted to seize control of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Belkin was just looking for an excuse to steal the franchise. This "fight" over JJ was just a way for him to get the ownership into court so that he can have the team to himself. Look at how the contracts were structured and you can see that it was in his thinking from the beginning.

As for Chad Ford, who cares, he's just another blowhard. Doesn't ever really say anything useful or informative. Most of what he says is speculation built out of hanging around chat rooms, it seems to me. He's attractive to BK bashers because he bashes BK. He's a moron to those who support BK because he takes every chance he can to insult BK> Hence, the two camps on the board...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:


Belkin was just looking for an excuse to steal the franchise. This "fight" over JJ was just a way for him to get the ownership into court so that he can have the team to himself. Look at how the contracts were structured and you can see that it was in his thinking from the beginning.

As for Chad Ford, who cares, he's just another blowhard. Doesn't ever really say anything useful or informative. Most of what he says is speculation built out of hanging around chat rooms, it seems to me. He's attractive to BK bashers because he bashes BK. He's a moron to those who support BK because he takes every chance he can to insult BK> Hence, the two camps on the board...


for once i am a moderate grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

The only thing more entertaining than Chad Ford's remarks about a team he clearly HATES, is that so-called fans on this site wholeheartedly agree with him.

You might not like Knight, Woodson, and/or the Atlanta Spirit, but why would anyone want to defend someone who clearly HATES their team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...