Game 1 Hawks vs. Celtics

[Bahamut]

I expect T-Mac to be the X-factor in this series.

[PureGreatness]

The Chat Room gonna be LIVE as hell tonight

[High5]

I'll never be one to paint the media as villains out to get Atlanta, but I love how the front page caption on NBA.com says "Health of the Celtics will play big role as they take on the Hawks."

[lethalweapon3]

Lots of one-and-done basketball in this series?Lowest Team Offensive Rebound Percentage, All NBA Teams 1973-74 to 2011-121. 2011-12 CELTICS 19.7% (only NBA team below 20% in recorded NBA history)2. 2009-10 Warriors, 20.9%3. 2010-11 Celtics, 21.1%4. 2009-10 Pacers, 21.6%5. 2007-08 Heat, 22.1%...17. 2010-11 Hawks, 23.4%...28. 2011-12 HAWKS, 23.9% (5th lowest among NBA teams this season)~lw3

[lethalweapon3]

It will be Kirk and the 4 J's (Jeff, Joe, Josh, and Jason) starting tonight, as confirmed by MC @AJC. Buckle Up!~lw3

[Gray Mule]

Bob R., Hawks announcer said, "Much of the national media assume thatthe Celtics drew a bye in the first round when they got the Hawks."Someone forgot to tell these Hawks. We all know that it's the best of seven series. So far, so good. Nice half time lead.GO HAWKS!!!

[Sothron]

I'm so glad we won tonight. Watching the national yuks try to find reasons to blame Boston instead of crediting the Hawks will be priceless.

[lethalweapon3]

Our bench players weren't great in Game 1, but that Boston bench... ick!Celtics bench (combined 51+ minutes) 4 points (2-for-7 shooting), 5 rebounds, 1 assist, 1 steal, 1 block, 3 turnovers.Ivan Johnson (by himself, 15 minutes) 4 points (2-for-4 shooting), 5 rebounds, 2 steals, 0 turnoversTracy McGrady (by himself, 13+ minutes) 4 points (2-for-4 shooting), 5 rebounds, 1 assist, 2 turnoversJannero Pargo (by himself, 10 minutes) 5 points (2-for-4 shooting), 1 assist~lw3

Edited April 30, 2012 by lethalweapon3

[lethalweapon3]

Paraphrasing LD from 790 The Zone interview minutes ago:“It was great just to hear, just to see, the fans. They gave our players a lot of energy with their energy.”“Any time you get out to a fast start like that… it can be a little deflating.” (for Celtics fans at Philips)(on Boston making their runs after falling behind) “We put a lot of emphasis on…learning how to weather the storm. They (Hawks players) don’t focus on the negatives, they play through the runs. We have to, in a sense be like them (Celtics), because they’ve been through it many more times than we have.”(on Rondo) “Josh Smith had the sense of diving for it and getting on the floor, which I thought was a very smart play. Clearly in looking back on it, there was definitely contact. We’re gonna factor Rondo in tomorrow, and if he doesn’t play we’ll make that adjustment.” (confirmed they’ll factor in Ray Allen in their game plans, too).(on Zaza) “We have our fingers crossed. Tomorrow night is still a possibility, but as of right now, we do not have Zaza factored in.”(on Teague) “He was aggressive, he was attacking, he was pushing the basketball… He has the speed and quickness to be a difference maker in any series.”~lw3

[lethalweapon3]

http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/04/29/nba-playoffs-hawks-again-scoff-at-the-notion-of-unsustainable-offense/

After years of watching the Atlanta Hawks operate within a zone of improbability, you’d think we might be better prepared to see them again best a sure favorite.

Yet here we are, as dumbstruck as the now 0-1 Boston Celtics. Atlanta didn’t stumble into a revelation of efficiency or make a crucial late-season addition. They merely played the same illogical brand of basketball that has marked the franchise for the last half-decade, and by way of talent, energy, and flat-out good fortune, they pounced on a Celtics team that wasn’t quite ready to begin their playoff run. I won’t submit into cliché and say that the Hawks “just wanted it more,” than the Celtics, but they certainly wanted to work more than their breathless opponents; Boston practically began the game hunched over, while Atlanta started their night with a 31-point rampage. That contrast speaks for itself, and although the game eventually leveled out, that almost seems beside the point.

By the time Atlanta’s shots stopped falling at such a ridiculous rate, the damage had been done and the game had been sufficiently mucked up. Although the Celtics typically benefit from uglied games minimized to single-possession battles, the Hawks — with their grit and uncanny ability to hit contested jumpers — too have managed to make this style their own.

That approach may have been epitomized by the odd success of Atlanta’s makeshift rotation of bigs. Josh Smith still provided his expectedly dynamic contributions, but beyond Smith were Jason Collins — whom Hawks head coach Larry Drew again elected to start as a defensive counter — and Ivan Johnson, two big men skilled in basketball’s dark arts, and thrown into relevance due to injuries to Al Horford and Zaza Pachulia. The decision to play an offensive liability like Collins against one of the best defensive teams in the league was an odd decision by Drew, but one that ultimately paid off; Collins played a huge role in erasing Kevin Garnett during the first half, and in his own detour into the impossible, actually converted three field goals — a feat he’s accomplished just seven times in the last four seasons.

For his part, Johnson contributed a surprisingly beneficial four points and five rebounds. That output may not seem like much, but considering that the Hawks only managed 83 points total (in a win, mind you), that Johnson himself matched the scoring total of Boston’s entire bench, and that three of his rebounds came on the offensive end in a game where extra scoring opportunities were much-needed, his impact stretched well beyond what those underwhelming numbers might imply.

It was micro-level contributions like those of Collins and Johnson that fleshed out Atlanta’s otherwise baffling performance, and gave it the texture to make it something other than what it was. The Hawks were on top of the world for minutes at a time, but as is usually the case with this team, every brilliant play was eventually met with several highly questionable ones. Only zeal was left to fill in the gaps; whether by feeding off of an earned home crowd or drawing from a self-instilled bit of confidence, the Hawks approached this game as one they could steal. They stared down a team that had been playing brutally effective defense over the last several months, drove into the paint at their whim, and dared try to beat Boston with Collins in tow and spot-up jumpers from Smith as a consistent weapon.

And it worked, because these are the Hawks, and this is just what they do. They render discussions of offensive sustainability completely irrelevant with their style and audacity, and the mitigate the importance of defense by managing to create shots in spite of it. Nothing is easy and nothing is aesthetically pleasing, but they manage to win in spite of themselves and our better judgment.

Even if all we can do is shake our heads in disbelief, the Celtics are undoubtedly left doing the same.

Closing thoughts:

[*]Just to make things that much worse for Boston, Rajon Rondo — the single Celtic who managed to put together a decent game — decided to fully embrace the game’s madness and make physical contact (a chest bump, but still) with official Mark Davis. Davis had all but killed Boston’s hopes for an endgame comeback with his correct determination that Josh Smith was fouled on what Rondo thought should have been a jump ball, and Rondo responded with harsh words and foolish action. The NBA doesn’t take any player making contact with an official lightly; it seems very likely that the Boston will be without both Ray Allen (ankle) and Rondo for Game 2, making things that much more fun for the struggling Celtics.

[*]Joe Johnson did some nice work defensively against Paul Pierce, but was absolutely miserable as a spot-up shooter. Smith, Kirk Hinrich, and Jeff Teague were able to get some nice penetration against Boston’s defense, but when they looked to the perimeter, they often saw Johnson standing more than a foot behind the three-point line. Even with the understanding that nothing that these Hawks do makes sense, I’m not sure how to even approach the peculiarity of Johnson’s placement. (On a related note: Johnson finished 0-of-9 from beyond the arc.)

[*]Smith is a tremendously fun — if curious — player, but I’ll never quite understand how he manages to have such great court awareness without having even the slightest bit of self-awareness. He’s a wonderful practitioner of the “extra pass,” and yet many of his shot attempts betray the basketball savvy that seems to inform his more altruistic efforts. You remain an enigma, Mr. Smith, and honestly, I wouldn’t have it any other way.

~lw3

[Guest]

http://probasketball...inable-offense/~lw3

Does this guy watch any Hawks games? It's tongue in cheek right? People who don't watch the Hawks have no idea about our defense, all they want to talk about is the offense. A lot of time when we win is because we play good solid defense.I see a lot of Celtics fans talking about our transition game and how theyhave to stop it and make us play halfcourt, sure - but they also don't know that this is not our typical style of play, it worked against the Celts because they are old and slow.When we pass the ball and have player movement in the halfcourt we are effective. It's the ISO stuff that kills us and we had too much of that in the 2nd half. Too much dribbling and players standing around. Edited April 30, 2012 by JayBirdHawk

[lethalweapon3]

Lots of one-and-done basketball in this series?Lowest Team Offensive Rebound Percentage, All NBA Teams 1973-74 to 2011-121. 2011-12 CELTICS 19.7% (only NBA team below 20% in recorded NBA history)2. 2009-10 Warriors, 20.9%3. 2010-11 Celtics, 21.1%4. 2009-10 Pacers, 21.6%5. 2007-08 Heat, 22.1%...17. 2010-11 Hawks, 23.4%...28. 2011-12 HAWKS, 23.9% (5th lowest among NBA teams this season)~lw3

Yesterday's Celtics starters (against the Horford-less, Pachulia-less Hawks): 3 total offensive reboundsGreg Steimsma: 4 offensive reboundsKeep it up! Box out and keep the rebounds from becoming tip contests!~lw3

[Diesel]

The Celtics can't play for the rebound and risk being beat down court.Run Coward... Run...