Mike Scott

[NBASupes]

.....

...

.

[nathan2331]

He shouldn't have been out there... but you play what you've got. At this point I'll stop whining about this series. It was a terible series of events to end the game, but we lost the game for ourselves.

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

[ATLHawks3]

Dellavedova is to blame.

[ersimo2889]

Hawks should NOT HAVE tried scoring on that 5-on-4, up by 1 with only 5 or so seconds separating the shot and game clock. (When Mike Scott got rejected)

 

Mike played hard but in key moments, he was highly disappointing tonight.

Edited May 25, 2015 by esimonds03

[jrok23]

Mike Scott is a disappointment in my book and I hope he isn't a hawk next year.

[NBASupes]

Playoff Teague was here. That's good. Real good. 

 

@Diesel, he showed up. 

[TheNorthCydeRises]

For you +/- lovers, Scott was -1 on the night. The rest of the team?

Carroll +11

Teague +8

Horford +4

Millsap +1

Schröder -3

Muscala -10

Bazemore -12

Mack -13

[High5]

If he just hits one of his wide open 3's then we probably win the game. He doesn't give us enough to be so unreliable at his supposed speciality. The and-1 for TT pissed me off, too. We should be wrapping him up and laying him out every time he touches the basketball. Don't give him easy buckets and touch fouls. 

[Dnice]

Even in ot jr gets 10 boards...

[NBASupes]

For you +/- lovers, Scott was -1 on the night. The rest of the team?

Carroll +11

Teague +8

Horford +4

Millsap +1

Schröder -3

Muscala -10

Bazemore -12

Mack -13

Schröder didn't that long but he wasn't effective today. Cleveland downloaded his card and now he's not as effective. Mack plays smart and shoots better than Jeff and Dennis but he's a liability on defense and doesn't have much talent in general. 

 

Bazemore is suppose to have a bad +/- considering the mins he was playing. 

Edited May 25, 2015 by nbasupes40retired

[AUhawksfan]

Why do you watch a ball go out of bounds in the playoffs?!? There's a 100% chance we have the ball than if you watch it go out and put the onus on the refs.

That was the nail in the coffin and disappointing. I thought he had a clutch edge but he's not showing it this playoffs.

[Flight]

Not sure where his head was at with some of the decision making on the shots he took in clutch time smh

[ATLHawks3]

Why do you watch a ball go out of bounds in the playoffs?!? There's a 100% chance we have the ball than if you watch it go out and put the onus on the refs.

That was the nail in the coffin and disappointing. I thought he had a clutch edge but he's not showing it this playoffs.

 

Man, that was what killed me. Even if the Cavs did touch it, if the ball is in the vicinity of you, get the damn ball! Smh, I still can't fault our effort tonight. Hopefully we've opened a Pandora's Box of what a joke NBA officiating is.

[Atlantaholic]

Mike Scott and Pero need to upgraded next year.

[PSSSHHHRRR87]

2 missed three pointers and watches the ball go out of bounds... he blew overtime for us... Yet, we still had a chance. Hawks are the better team, but the Cavs have the better players and they're hitting shots.

[ATLHawks3]

2 missed three pointers and watches the ball go out of bounds... he blew overtime for us... Yet, we still had a chance. Hawks are the better team, but the Cavs have the better players and they're hitting shots.

 

Whenever the refs are on your side, you always win. I've never seen a more biased game in my life.

[Johnnybravo4]

Don't know what Bud has against Moose

[yungsta]

Don't know what Bud has against Moose

 

I do remember a short stretch when he checked in he immediately gave up like 3 offensive rebounds in a row then shortly after he got his shot blocked and the ball bounced on his head out of bounds. He was getting embarrassed out there. 

 

Im guessing thats what got him benched.

[Johnnybravo4]

Scott wasn't much better

[yungsta]

Scott wasn't much better

I completely agree I would of taken anyone else on the hawks bench besides mike scott. he cost us the game.