Jump to content
  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $390 of $700 target

I hope the Siakam deal fails to go through.


givemesome1ce1

Recommended Posts

  • Premium Member

I personally don't think that Siakam is the right guy, but the whole point of building is to find your star (Trae), sign complimentary vets, draft and develop players around him, and when the time comes... consolidate some of that developing talent and assets for all-star level players that can take you to the next level. We're closing in on the later. Trae and Dejounte can't wait years for guys to develop, especially when it looks like we're a move away from competing for an Eastern Conference Championship at least.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

COST TOO MUCH!  I continue to say this about Siakam.  What does Canada want for him?  They want a complete rebuild of their roster with several young Hawks.  Do we expect him to lead us to the NBA championship?  Yep.  Just as he did his team last season!

Wait!  What?  They didn't win it all?  Why not?  After all, they had Siakam.  You mean, he couldn't do it last season but he can if he's traded to us?  What if we trade for him and he becomes injured?  Hawks would be dead in the water.  If one of our youth goes down we have others.  But, if they are gone to Canada, - - - - 

I hope we don't do this.  Siakam costs too much!!

:ahf:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
10 minutes ago, thecampster said:

Let me try it this way.

 

Siakam - year 2 - age 23 PER36 numbers.

12.6PP36 on 50.8% FG%, efg%.537, 22 3pt%, 7.8 rp36, 3.4 ap36, 1.3 sp36, 0.9 bp36.

 

JJ - year 2 - age 20 PER36 numbers

13.6PP36 on 49.1% FG%, efg%.537, 28.8 3pt%, 9.7 rp36, 2.9 ap36, 1.3 sp36, 1.2 bp36.

 

I've bolded where each player "won" the matchup.  Comparing 21 year old JJ to 29 year old Siakam is not a fair comparison. But JJ has every a solid chance to end up just as good based on their year 2 numbers.

The question becomes timing, no?  Even if we take this comparison at face value and assume the same trajectory -- are we comfortable not making moves to win now so that we have an all-star level PF ready in 4 years?  We have a great opportunity to win big in the next 1-4 years in my opinion, for a few reasons:

  • New CBA is going to make current contenders worse in the coming years
  • By making contenders worse, we have an opening to take advantage of, since we will not be negatively impacted
  • DJs value contract gives us a lot of room and flexibility.  4 years from now he's up for an extension
  • Trae will be eligible for a 35% max in 3 years which will be constraining on our cap space
  • We have some young guys on good contracts
  • Last note -- I specifically didn't call this a 1-4 window because I think with the development staff and coaching staff we will always be giving ourselves a shot.  Even if we swap a lot of pieces around -- even Trae -- I believe we will always have a chance to make a splash.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, JeffS17 said:

The question becomes timing, no?  Even if we take this comparison at face value and assume the same trajectory -- are we comfortable not making moves to win now so that we have an all-star level PF ready in 4 years?  We have a great opportunity to win big in the next 1-4 years in my opinion, for a few reasons:

  • New CBA is going to make current contenders worse in the coming years
  • By making contenders worse, we have an opening to take advantage of, since we will not be negatively impacted
  • DJs value contract gives us a lot of room and flexibility.  4 years from now he's up for an extension
  • Trae will be eligible for a 35% max in 3 years which will be constraining on our cap space
  • We have some young guys on good contracts
  • Last note -- I specifically didn't call this a 1-4 window because I think with the development staff and coaching staff we will always be giving ourselves a shot.  Even if we swap a lot of pieces around -- even Trae -- I believe we will always have a chance to make a splash.

Timing is certainly the focal point as far as keeping Trae satisfied, etc.  Having said that, check out the jump Siakam made from Year 2 to Year 3.  Is JJ capable of something similar?  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
3 minutes ago, Hawkish said:

Timing is certainly the focal point as far as keeping Trae satisfied, etc.  Having said that, check out the jump Siakam made from Year 2 to Year 3.  Is JJ capable of something similar?  

I hope so 🙂

I'll be very sad if we trade him.  I actually think it's more likely we trade AJ though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Peoriabird said:

There is no patients here.  Some think that somehow Siakam makes this team a contender which is totally laughable.  Some of these guy really need to root for the Knicks at this point because is exactly the moves they have made year after year with the Mello's and Randles of the NBA to remain a treadmill team.

So if we stand pat, what are we now?

Are we still a .500 team?

Are we a 50 win team?

Are we top 4 in the East?

 

What is your assessment of the Hawks if we make no more moves?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Spud2nique said:

You can’t stop the Siakam deal, you can’t even contain it.

I’m gonna say I’d be surprised. 

I'd be shocked if BenJalen JohnSimmonson isn't significantly better than Siakim this year.  That that, squd. 

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thecampster said:

Let me try it this way.

 

Siakam - year 2 - age 23 PER36 numbers.

12.6PP36 on 50.8% FG%, efg%.537, 22 3pt%, 7.8 rp36, 3.4 ap36, 1.3 sp36, 0.9 bp36.

 

JJ - year 2 - age 20 PER36 numbers

13.6PP36 on 49.1% FG%, efg%.537, 28.8 3pt%, 9.7 rp36, 2.9 ap36, 1.3 sp36, 1.2 bp36.

 

I've bolded where each player "won" the matchup.  Comparing 21 year old JJ to 29 year old Siakam is not a fair comparison. But JJ has every a solid chance to end up just as good based on their year 2 numbers.

You sure?

What we know about Siakam is that even in college, he had a high motor and a great work ethic.

With Jalen, his work ethic and loyalty has been questioned, whether it be unfair or not.

I like Jalen and have no issue seeing him develop. With Siakam, he made the jump in Year 3 and was a All-Star by Year 4.

So if Jalen is to make that jump, he MUST start at the 4 this season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
17 minutes ago, thecampster said:

So I just keep going back to the 15 game sample after the all-star break. His Per36 during that time equates to 15.5p/9.9r/4.7a/1.9s/1.9b on 52.9% shooting/30.4% 3pt shooting.  If that is really what we'd be looking at with him, I can't imagine trading that away.

 

I think there's a decent shot he can get his three ball to 35% too which will open up his game massively.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jalen's Weaknesses coming into the draft

image.thumb.png.2f31ca5d2179c6023d7635bf9fa2d62f.png

 

Siakam's Weaknesses coming into the draft

image.thumb.png.6de08bf063c0ce17ea79b582b917429b.png

 

The biggest thing I see between the two, is that most of the things listed as weakness about Siakam, center around tweaking his game and tightening up his body.  They also didn't believe he was as good as his numbers showed, due to not playing in one of the power basketball conferences.

Most of the weaknesses listed around Jalen center around consistency with his shooting and playmaking.  And they questioned his attitude and commitment, which I hope are not issues at the moment.

Siakam has vastly surpassed his projection of being Luc Mbah a Moute.  Jalen's comparison was Stephen Jackson, which is a much tougher comparison to live up to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thecampster said:

So I just keep going back to the 15 game sample after the all-star break. His Per36 during that time equates to 15.5p/9.9r/4.7a/1.9s/1.9b on 52.9% shooting/30.4% 3pt shooting.  If that is really what we'd be looking at with him, I can't imagine trading that away.

 

This all happened at age 21 in his first chance at legitimate playing time, and right after getting Quin.   On day 1 I remember a Quin interview where he was like we need to get this guy involved, he's too gifted to not be playing.  JJ responded immediately.  He also adds rim protection and plays passing lanes and is a good rebounder and can guard 5 positions, all things we will need if OO is starting.

JC is now gone so that opens up a lot more playing time.  

JJ also dominated in the summer league and g-league, was a 5 star recruit and only fell b/c of the situation at Duke.  He was a STEAL.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...