Premium Member NineOhTheRino Posted January 9, 2011 Premium Member Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 I can't think of another team with this much talent that's not being talked about as a possible contender? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seano Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 I can't think of another team with this much talent that's not being talked about as a possible contender? Because despite the fact we've got some good players, we've also got glaring weaknesses, and we're not an outstanding defensive team to where that can overcome our weaknesses, and the playyoffs are generally the place where your weaknesses will get *really* exposed. We also don't have that upper echelon, top tier type of player like a Kobe or LeButthead, but then again most teams don't. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jy23 Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 simply because we're weak in the most important positions on the court....If one of those players you were talking about was a true point guard then I'm pretty sure we'd be getting some championship talk but our lineup is flawed and it is what it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLJA316 Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 * see the box scores from last year's Hawks/Magic 2nd round matchup for your answer. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimp Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 ummm maybe because some of those all-star level players, don't play at an all-star level during the playoffs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Wretch Posted January 9, 2011 Premium Member Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 Jumpers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yungsta Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 um no true leader, no dominant post presence, bad team defense, no superstar, not consistent with effort, predictable offense :write a letter: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainview1981 Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 I can't think of another team with this much talent that's not being talked about as a possible contender? This team hasn't faired well against really good teams outside of Utah and Orlando... So why would people be talking about that? The problem is no depth and Mike is no longer a starting NBA PG. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 My .02 worth. I'm guessing the 4 all star level players you are thinking of are Joe, Jamal, Josh and Al. That makes two PFs and two SGs.......Flawed team design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexmethylphenidate Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 um no true leader, no dominant post presence, bad team defense, no superstar, not consistent with effort, predictable offense :write a letter: These problems has been fixed when they canned Woody. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wurider05 Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 That's something that people don't fully get. It takes more that pure talent to win championships. Every team with a good offensive point guard has a chance to beat us. Until Smoove and AL develop a post game we will be in the same situation. Our team is soft and doesn't like contact. You guys hate Marvin's guts but he is the only on on the team that seems to be willing to take it to the hole and draw the foul consistently. Guys need to have defined roles instead of just going out there. Everybody can't average 20 points a game. We are seemingly moving in the right direction but we need to stop shooting so many jumpers. Smoove whether as a PF or SF won't be getting any open jumpers against Boston, Orlando, Miami, or Chicago. We dominate weak teams (like we suppose to) and pump our chests out like we did something. Our schedule has been very easy. We still don't have that defining win this season. I know that we have injuries this season. I think that we need to see a starting lineup of Teague-Crawford-JJ-Smoove-Horf. I think that the Bibby-Marvin combo off the bench could be deadly. You can actually run plays for Marvin and have him moving around. Whenever he gets gets 10+ shots he produces but he can't be a part of the offense sharing the ball with Josh, JJ, Craw, and Horf. He needs to come off the bench. That would be the best bet for us to be successful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crank Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 I agree they that we have 4 all star caliber players but the issue is that they are four #2 - #3 all star caliber players when to get the leagues attention you gotta have a #1 . IMO this is team, evaluation time and who shows up in the playoffs this year would be who stays to play Robin to whoever we trade who doesnt show up for Batman. I mentioned a few weeks ago that the league doesnt see Joe,Josh, or Al among the nba elite they are considered good player but below the Amares,Boozers etc of the league. Its why we have few national tv games and no xmas game but they put on the knicks ,GS and the Blazers ? Its about perception and our players can either alter it or be moved its really all on them now . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wurider05 Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 I agree they that we have 4 all star caliber players but the issue is that they are four #2 - #3 all star caliber players when to get the leagues attention you gotta have a #1 . IMO this is team, evaluation time and who shows up in the playoffs this year would be who stays to play Robin to whoever we trade who doesnt show up for Batman. I mentioned a few weeks ago that the league doesnt see Joe,Josh, or Al among the nba elite they are considered good player but below the Amares,Boozers etc of the league. Its why we have few national tv games and no xmas game but they put on the knicks ,GS and the Blazers ? Its about perception and our players can either alter it or be moved its really all on them now . You can tell this by the all star voting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimp Posted January 9, 2011 Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 JJ has to take his game to another level for the Hawks to do anything in the playoffs.JJ has been one of the worst #1 options in the playoffs the last 2 years.He has not shot well, and other #1 options get to the freethrow line 2x more than Joe JOE 17.1ppg - 40.fg% - 3.9 FT attempts per game Wade 31.1ppg -50%fg - 8.1 freethrow attempts per game Pierce 19.9ppg -43%fg - 6.4 freethrow attempts per game Lebron 32.2ppg - 50%fg 12.7 freethrow attempts per game Rose 22.7ppg - 47%fg - 3.9 freethrow attempts per game Dirk 26.7ppg - 53%fg - 8.4 freethrow attempts per game Deron 22.2 ppg - 43%fg - 10.1 freethrow attempts per game Kobe 29.6ppg - 45%fg - 8.2 freethrow attempts per game Duncan 19.4 ppg - 52%fg - 6.4 freethrow attempts per game Paul 21,9ppg - 48%fg - 5.8 freethrow attempts per game Anthony 28.9ppg - 45%fg - 9.1 freethrow attempts per game Iggy 17.3ppg - 39%fg - 7.6 freethrow attempts per game Amare 22.5ppg - 52%fg - 8.1 freethrow attempts per game Howard 19.1ppg - 60%fg - 9.9 freethrow attempts per game Maybe LD's offense well help JJ be more successful in the playoffs , giving him more open shots and fewer ISOs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted January 9, 2011 Premium Member Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 I can't think of another team with this much talent that's not being talked about as a possible contender? You live by the shot, you die by the shot. We have talent, but it's centered around the 2-4 positions. We have 2 missing skillsets: 1. Floor General. In a motion offense, it's not as needed, however, a true floor general will enhance the motion. 2. Low Post scorer. Neither Al nor Smoove is a traditional back to the basket low post scorers. PLUS, we don't have guards or forwards that can score by driving. That means that we are a jump shooting team. We give token advances towards the rim. Therefore, good teams just pack it in, keep a hand in our faces and dare us to shoot. Our answer has been swing the ball and take the open shot. Well, that looks pretty when the shots are falling, but it's a mess when they aren't. So you see we have guys who can score and who knows all the moons might line up, but without that low post threat either by traditional low post play or by somebody attacking the goal, we can't get past really good teams. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Wretch Posted January 9, 2011 Premium Member Report Share Posted January 9, 2011 You live by the shot, you die by the shot. We have talent, but it's centered around the 2-4 positions. We have 2 missing skillsets: 1. Floor General. In a motion offense, it's not as needed, however, a true floor general will enhance the motion. 2. Low Post scorer. Neither Al nor Smoove is a traditional back to the basket low post scorers. PLUS, we don't have guards or forwards that can score by driving. That means that we are a jump shooting team. We give token advances towards the rim. Therefore, good teams just pack it in, keep a hand in our faces and dare us to shoot. Our answer has been swing the ball and take the open shot. Well, that looks pretty when the shots are falling, but it's a mess when they aren't. So you see we have guys who can score and who knows all the moons might line up, but without that low post threat either by traditional low post play or by somebody attacking the goal, we can't get past really good teams. Yep. Yep. I keep thinking about this. The motion offense is great. It's the best thing for this team and was the remedy LONG before LD took over. Because of this one change, I have said (and will stand by it) that we will have better showings against better teams late in the year and in the playoffs. However, SOME ISO is necessary. We don't have a penetrating PG, Smoove can't do it, and it's not Horford's job. So we need JJ and Jamal breaking down the defense every now and again. It's the best we can do without a low post threat. BUT - I think having Joe and Jamal take turns running the point would work to our advantage. They're both good penetrators, passers, and have decent court vision (+1 I think to Jamal over JJ in that regard). Long term, and by that I mean within the next season and a half, it's going to be on Teague to sprout wings and get this done for us - or we need to see about getting us a floor general. As is, I think we can be very good. I think we ARE very good. Although I am a proponent of change...I really like all of our pieces. We take a step back trading JJ, because he is the meat and potatoes of our offense. There are many teams that would want him as a #2 (or #1) and, opinions on his contract aside, we already have him. Horford is about the only untouchable piece we have and Smoove... Man, when I think about trading him, a lump forms in my throat. I know the route to putting us over or keeping us in Averageville is directly tied to those three. I just wish we could do that Nash thing and buy them some more time. I'm hoping we catch a break like that. But barring such a pickup, or a major change to how the core plays, we're going to need to reevaluate in the next couple of seasons (especially considering Jamal's FA status. He's going to get some serious interest). I just don't want to see us sent home after the 2nd round for the next 4-5 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 (edited) I think Horford could easily be a guy who scores a lot inside. Now that he has established his outside shot bigs have to come out on him. He is quick enough to beat almost all of them off the dribble. He just doesn't do it enough and when he does do it he is very predictable, shooting quickly without any fakes or change of direction. He is already having a very big year, but his ability to hit those midrange shots really opens the door for him to be an Amare-lite type of player which frankly i never thought i would say. Edited January 10, 2011 by exodus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Diesel Posted January 10, 2011 Premium Member Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 I think Horford could easily be a guy who scores a lot inside. Now that he has established his outside shot bigs have to come out on him. He is quick enough to beat almost all of them off the dribble. He just doesn't do it enough and when he does do it he is very predictable, shooting quickly without any fakes or change of direction. He is already having a very big year, but his ability to hit those midrange shots really opens the door for him to be an Amare-lite type of player which frankly i never thought i would say. You're talking about hopes and dreams and not reality. The truth is that Horf is a high post PF. He doesn't have the confidence to "blow" past his defender from the high post or the baseline. We like to call Karl Malone, but he's not the Karl Malone yet. I would have him working out with Otis Thorpe. Thorpe was a high post guy who could put the ball on the floor and quickly turn. In fact, all those old dudes could dribble. Fundamentals aren't taught anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joker Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 You're talking about hopes and dreams and not reality. The truth is that Horf is a high post PF. He doesn't have the confidence to "blow" past his defender from the high post or the baseline. We like to call Karl Malone, but he's not the Karl Malone yet. I would have him working out with Otis Thorpe. Thorpe was a high post guy who could put the ball on the floor and quickly turn. In fact, all those old dudes could dribble. Fundamentals aren't taught anymore. He's much closer to Malone than Thorpe. He's better than Thorpe. He's a PnR PF with Bibby who is average at the PnR. Have you been watching Hedo. Very good PnR player and with Dwight is much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exodus Posted January 10, 2011 Report Share Posted January 10, 2011 You're talking about hopes and dreams and not reality. The truth is that Horf is a high post PF. He doesn't have the confidence to "blow" past his defender from the high post or the baseline. We like to call Karl Malone, but he's not the Karl Malone yet. I would have him working out with Otis Thorpe. Thorpe was a high post guy who could put the ball on the floor and quickly turn. In fact, all those old dudes could dribble. Fundamentals aren't taught anymore. So is Amare. Amare is not a low post player. In the past Horford didn't have the confidence to consistently take all the open midrange shots he was always given. Now he does and his making them at over a 50% clip. That is a fantasy that turned into a reality. It is much more reasonable now to believe that Horford could be effective off the dribble than it was to believe that he could shoot over 50% on jumpers. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now