Jump to content
  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $390 of $700 target

Darvin Ham, Nick Nurse, Fizdale, or Stackhouse


NBASupes

Who?  

30 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Vol4ever said:

Who would want this job? 

No one that actually has other options.  This is by far the least attractive job that is available.  You are guaranteed to be fired if you take this job, because you will not be winning anytime soon.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KB21 said:

No one that actually has other options.  This is by far the least attractive job that is available.  You are guaranteed to be fired if you take this job, because you will not be winning anytime soon.

You seriously would rate the Charlotte and Orlando jobs ahead of Atlanta?! Two fellow non-playoff teams with bad cap situations and thus no hope of turning things around anytime soon?

Heck, even Phoenix is not clearly ahead of Atlanta UNLESS Sarver/McDonough actually follow through on their bold promise to hit the free agent market hard this summer. Otherwise, Phoenix just consists of a Shooter (Booker), an OK (Warren), a Bust (Len), and two Probably Nots (Chriss, Bender). 

Even New York is a questionable job right now, with a similarly bad cap situation, and with Porzingis likely to be out most or all of next year.

Only Milwaukee is a clearly better job, because of Giannis.

I'll take a team with significant draft capital, cap flexibility, and a virtually new arena in the works, to attract an enterprising young coach, over those first 3 dead end jobs.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, parfait said:

You seriously would rate the Charlotte and Orlando jobs ahead of Atlanta?! Two fellow non-playoff teams with bad cap situations and thus no hope of turning things around anytime soon?

Heck, even Phoenix is not clearly ahead of Atlanta UNLESS Sarver/McDonough actually follow through on their bold promise to hit the free agent market hard this summer. Otherwise, Phoenix just consists of a Shooter (Booker), an OK (Warren), a Bust (Len), and two Probably Nots (Chriss, Bender). 

Even New York is a questionable job right now, with a similarly bad cap situation, and with Porzingis likely to be out most or all of next year.

Only Milwaukee is a clearly better job, because of Giannis.

I'll take a team with significant draft capital, cap flexibility, and a virtually new arena in the works, to attract an enterprising young coach, over those first 3 dead end jobs.

The Hawks job is a guaranteed losing situation.  No credible coach is going to take this job.  

Draft capital doesn’t mean shit for these coaches.  All that represents are dumb young players that will not help them win.  

The Hawks pitch to coaches, if they are honest which we know Schlenk isn’t, is that they have no desire to win for the next 2-3 years and that said coach will have to be on board with that plan.  

Of course, Schlenk the liar will probably tell him some bullshit about how he’s not really tanking and wants to be competitive.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, parfait said:

You seriously would rate the Charlotte and Orlando jobs ahead of Atlanta?! Two fellow non-playoff teams with bad cap situations and thus no hope of turning things around anytime soon?

Heck, even Phoenix is not clearly ahead of Atlanta UNLESS Sarver/McDonough actually follow through on their bold promise to hit the free agent market hard this summer. Otherwise, Phoenix just consists of a Shooter (Booker), an OK (Warren), a Bust (Len), and two Probably Nots (Chriss, Bender). 

Even New York is a questionable job right now, with a similarly bad cap situation, and with Porzingis likely to be out most or all of next year.

Only Milwaukee is a clearly better job, because of Giannis.

I'll take a team with significant draft capital, cap flexibility, and a virtually new arena in the works, to attract an enterprising young coach, over those first 3 dead end jobs.

What good is cap when no significant free agents will sign with you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, KB21 said:

That would definitely insure the tanking strategy, because that guy can't coach himself out of a wet paper sack.

Hmmm........Texas and his record seem to disagree.   But, I like him because he is a cheap/tough it out option.  Young and if he can't cut the mustard he at least can relate to the young team we are fielding.  If someone like Hammond would take the job I'm all for it. but I don't see legit Nba up and comers wanting this job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...