Jump to content
  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $390 of $700 target

Hawks trade for no. 4 pick


JTB

Recommended Posts

  • Premium Member
2 minutes ago, txsting said:

We paid pick 17, 35, the cleveland 2020 pick, and like 10 million dollars (solomon hill) for the right to choose between three guys who didn't have a ton of obvious separation, and where one was practically guaranteed to fall to you.  Schlenk proved he's got a set on him last year, and he's doubling down this year.

If Hunter competes for rookie of the year like Trae did last year, I'll never question Schlenk again!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

I don't like this trade. Hunter is an old rookie for NBA reasons and has a limited offensive game. He's a defensive specialist. You don't give up what we gave up to draft Bruce Bowen with the #4 pick.

This kid better be Pippen 2.0 for this kind of insane overpay.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sothron said:

I don't like this trade. Hunter is an old rookie for NBA reasons and has a limited offensive game. He's a defensive specialist. You don't give up what we gave up to draft Bruce Bowen with the #4 pick.

This kid better be Pippen 2.0 for this kind of insane overpay.

I feel icky.  I agree with saphron on this one.

Hunter is a low-ceiling player you do not draft top 5.  Hoping more is afoot.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Peoriabird said:

Already seeing positive signs that it is possible because @Sothron hates the pick!  So there is hope!!!

Haha, it's funny 'cause it's true.

Stop glaring at me, with.

Dang, now CLE shopping 5, likely to teams wanting Garland.  Get it done, Schlank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kg01 said:

What does this mean?

The pick is the pick, both teams want the player and know what they would've paid NOP for it.

i'm assuming you meant to turn around and flip the 4 and move down.  If not, sorry.  But I was just saying, i don't think there is time to get that done at this point, so i don't think it was the point of the move at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, txsting said:

i'm assuming you meant to turn around and flip the 4 and move down.  If not, sorry.  But I was just saying, i don't think there is time to get that done at this point, so i don't think it was the point of the move at all.

Ok, I understand.  I disagree.  If our f.o. is prepared, it can be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Thomas said:

Guess we know who our starting SF is now or is it still down to two or maybe even three if Cam really is still around at #10.

Pelicans  have 8 ..they might Pair Cam with Zion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
5 minutes ago, Peoriabird said:

Already seeing positive signs that it is possible because @Sothron hates the pick!  So there is hope!!!

It isn't so much the pick as the trade to give up that much to get a guy that frankly is on the same level as whoever we could have gotten at #8.

Just now, pimp said:

Pelicans  have 8 ..they might Pair Cam with Zion

That's exactly what I am predicting to happen. No better to keep Zion happy in NO than to draft one of his running mates from Duke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...