Jump to content
  • Current Donation Goals

    • Raised $390 of $700 target

Official Game Thread: Hawks at Kings


lethalweapon3

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators
2 minutes ago, bleachkit said:

Since CC can't shoot, and he basically has to occupy the lane, JC is forced out to the perimeter where his skills are not best utilized. There's no good answer to this problem.

The one thing we can and should do more of is making a deliberate effort to get JC scoring in the 20.5 minutes when CC is off the floor.  That isn't half the game but is pretty close to half the game.  JC scoring is always nice because he is so efficient and productive with his opportunities.  His limitation is that it isn't going to be scalable beyond the 20 ppg (without CC) that he has shown because he doesn't have enough ability to create his own shot.  But even this season with his struggles from 3 he is still scoring at a nice .582% TS% clip and we could use more of that on a team that is near the bottom of the league in scoring efficiency.  I would say we have seen something closer to a deliberate effort to marginalize JC as a scorer (i.e., do less to feature him or offer him meaningful opportunities beyond clean-up and standing on the perimeter) than a deliberate effort to maximize the efficient scoring he can offer.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

CAPTION THIS...

B8CE81E0-F149-4B9B-B154-5B94B803CB74.jpe

Kev:  Who ate the Last Corndog?

Dude:  You see, this is what I'm talking about... Always Blaming us for something.   He's another Karen.

Women:  I admit it... I did it.   They said that corndogs help you win!!  I'm sorry...

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
21 minutes ago, Diesel said:

Yeah... I think that Nate didn't mail it in last night.   He was engaged.    I think about his situation.....

He's possibly a HOF coach.  Played the game at a high level.   

But...  
Over the past weeks... most of the season, he has had to feel undermined.  Undermined by who?

1.  Ownership.     Nate didn't want to trade away Kev.   I honestly think Kev was one of Nate's favs...  And he was traded for pennies on the dollar. 

2.  Trae.  There's a power struggle going on above Nate's head.. and Trae is in the midst of it. 

3.  Landry.   I think Travis was Nate's guy.  I think Travis protected Nate to a degree.  I think Nate knows the game, Landry is going to want his own guys in place and has the green light from Nick. 

 

We talk about Nate's stubbornness.  I hope he takes the "I'm going to give my best coaching on my way out" approach.   

Keep using offensive plays Nate.   Force them to listen to you.  Everybody's happy when we win.

I think that is a very real perspective for him. If he has to go out, go out swinging. Don’t just stand with arms folded hoping the guys get it together.  If he wants to seal his hall of fame bid, he has to turn this thing around fast and get us back into contention. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
3 minutes ago, MarylandHawk said:

I think that is a very real perspective for him. If he has to go out, go out swinging. Don’t just stand with arms folded hoping the guys get it together.  If he wants to seal his hall of fame bid, he has to turn this thing around fast and get us back into contention. 

I agree with this.   In the middle of his career, I believe he became reliant on vets to carry his team.   Give little direction, being a players coach, and letting the vets and star players do what they do. 

Well, that won't work with this bunch.  They are too ego driven.   Trae, DJ, and Bogi all have that ball hoggery gene.   Trae, Hunter, and many of the rest can be sometimey on defensive effort.   Especially when Clint is not there barking at them.   JC and Hunter can easily be lost in the sauce.

These are the areas where a coaches voice and presence is needed.   This ship doesn't really right itself.  It will continue to go in that direction unless a new voice arises.   Not a blaming voice.. but a hey.. we have to do it this way voice.   Last night.. even during the breaks, Nate was coaching.   He was talking to guys and they were responding. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
8 minutes ago, Diesel said:

I agree with this.   In the middle of his career, I believe he became reliant on vets to carry his team.   Give little direction, being a players coach, and letting the vets and star players do what they do. 

Well, that won't work with this bunch.  They are too ego driven.   Trae, DJ, and Bogi all have that ball hoggery gene.   Trae, Hunter, and many of the rest can be sometimey on defensive effort.   Especially when Clint is not there barking at them.   JC and Hunter can easily be lost in the sauce.

These are the areas where a coaches voice and presence is needed.   This ship doesn't really right itself.  It will continue to go in that direction unless a new voice arises.   Not a blaming voice.. but a hey.. we have to do it this way voice.   Last night.. even during the breaks, Nate was coaching.   He was talking to guys and they were responding. 

 

 

This is so spot on. Particularly the comment about coaching veteran players. Another reason why that ECF squad was effective. Gallo, Lou, the Knife, Snell, Clint, Bogi and even Rondo early on were guys he could count on to figure it out and rally the other guys. He does not have that luxury now. He has to do it.  Trae, John, and DeJounte are learning how to do it but are running into rough patches. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
33 minutes ago, AHF said:

The one thing we can and should do more of is making a deliberate effort to get JC scoring in the 20.5 minutes when CC is off the floor.  That isn't half the game but is pretty close to half the game.  JC scoring is always nice because he is so efficient and productive with his opportunities.  His limitation is that it isn't going to be scalable beyond the 20 ppg (without CC) that he has shown because he doesn't have enough ability to create his own shot.  But even this season with his struggles from 3 he is still scoring at a nice .582% TS% clip and we could use more of that on a team that is near the bottom of the league in scoring efficiency.  I would say we have seen something closer to a deliberate effort to marginalize JC as a scorer (i.e., do less to feature him or offer him meaningful opportunities beyond clean-up and standing on the perimeter) than a deliberate effort to maximize the efficient scoring he can offer.

very well laid out. 

Particular when he has mismatches, the ball needs to get to him on time.  His ability to hit freethrows (if the refs give him the call) is also helpful 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
3 minutes ago, warcore said:

puff puff PASS Diesel

COACH GP W Win % PPG RPG APG SPG FG% 3P% FT%
Gregg Popovich 2083 1,356 65 100.9 43 22.8 7.3 46.7 37.1 75
Don Nelson 2398 1,335 56 108.2           76.3
Lenny Wilkens 2487 1,332 54 102.8 44.4 24       75.2
Jerry Sloan 2024 1,221 60 101.3 41.8 25.2 8.2 48 34.8 76.3
Pat Riley 1904 1,210 64 102.5 43 24.8   48   74.7
George Karl 1999 1,175 59 104.8 42.1 23.7 9.1 47.1 36 75.6
Phil Jackson 1640 1,155 70 103.1 43.7 24.1 8.4 47.2 35.6 73.7
Larry Brown 2002 1,098 55 99.9           73.9
Doc Rivers 1815 1,066 59 103.2 42 22.7 8 46.5 36.7 75.7
Rick Adelman 1791 1,042 58 104 44 23.6 8.4 45.7 35.2 76.1
Bill Fitch 2050 944 46 104.9 45 23.9       74.1
Red Auerbach 1419 938 66 103            
d*ck Motta 1952 935 48 106.5           75.4
Rick Carlisle 1646 882 54 101.4 42 22.2 7.4 45.3 35.7 77.6
Jack Ramsay 1647 864 52 110.5         26.6 75
Cotton Fitzsimmons 1607 832 52 110.7           75.6
Gene Shue 1645 784 48 107.4           74.3
Nate McMillan 1369 722 53 100.2 41.1 21.8 7.5 45.8 36.6 77.1
John MacLeod 1364 707 52 107.9 44.1 26.5   48.3 28 76.2
Red Holzman 1300 696 54 104.9           74.1
Erik Spoelstra 1152 680 59 102.8 41.9 22.3 7.7 46.7 36.1 75.8
Mike D'Antoni 1199 672 56 107.2 42.1 22.9 7.6 46.1 36.5 77.3
Mike Fratello 1215 667 55 99.6 41.1 22.7 8.4 46.7 35.6 75.7
Flip Saunders 1246 654 52 97.1 41.8 23.1 7.3 45.4 35.1 76.6
Chuck Daly 1075 638 59 105.3 45.1 24.4   47.1 30.7 76

 

 

Based on the list... this is the list.   Nate is borderline?  I mean Cotton Fitzsimmons and Bill Fitch are in the Hall but d*ck Motta and Jack Ramsey are not.   This last leg could be the deciding factor of if he gets in or not.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
On 1/3/2023 at 1:17 AM, JayBirdHawk said:

Looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane.

I think Hunter didn't like my comment ^^:hehe:.  He actually used his size, length and speed last night.  

Now....let's see a repeat of this on Friday.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Spud2nique said:

DM with the beautiful rip. Before that the AND 1! 
 

Kudos to Hunter he stepped up. JC was a mad. OO battled Sabonis in a fun physical matchup. 
 

Here is DM with the rip again.

060F7DE7-F488-43EF-8A76-19CE3E6030F2.jpeg

78642C29-6B6B-4CAD-87DD-DF075969A4A5.jpeg

@kg01 no shout out for my first take picture 📷 fast 💨 twitch capturing of the steal? I shot the dang thing when DM picked it, albeit the replay but FIRST TAKE! 🙇🏿‍♂️ 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
6 minutes ago, Spud2nique said:

I tried to play the caption this but apparently it’s ©️ by Diesel, he didn’t laugh at my captions but reposted the same thing and pretending he didn’t see it. He gets weird with those but ill play anyways. 😂 

See .. 

As posters, I have many a scouting report. 😂 

You're right.. I did take yours for inspiration.   

My Bad.

 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
ACH GP W Win % PPG RPG APG SPG FG% 3P% FT%
Gregg Popovich 2083 1,356 65 100.9 43 22.8 7.3 46.7 37.1 75
Don Nelson 2398 1,335 56 108.2           76.3
Lenny Wilkens 2487 1,332 54 102.8 44.4 24       75.2
Jerry Sloan 2024 1,221 60 101.3 41.8 25.2 8.2 48 34.8 76.3
Pat Riley 1904 1,210 64 102.5 43 24.8   48   74.7
George Karl 1999 1,175 59 104.8 42.1 23.7 9.1 47.1 36 75.6
Phil Jackson 1640 1,155 70 103.1 43.7 24.1 8.4 47.2 35.6 73.7
Larry Brown 2002 1,098 55 99.9           73.9
Doc Rivers 1815 1,066 59 103.2 42 22.7 8 46.5 36.7 75.7
Rick Adelman 1791 1,042 58 104 44 23.6 8.4 45.7 35.2 76.1
Bill Fitch 2050 944 46 104.9 45 23.9       74.1
Red Auerbach 1419 938 66 103            
d*ck Motta 1952 935 48 106.5           75.4
Rick Carlisle 1646 882 54 101.4 42 22.2 7.4 45.3 35.7 77.6
Jack Ramsay 1647 864 52 110.5         26.6 75
Cotton Fitzsimmons 1607 832 52 110.7           75.6
Gene Shue 1645 784 48 107.4           74.3
Nate McMillan 1369 722 53 100.2 41.1 21.8 7.5 45.8 36.6 77.1
John MacLeod 1364 707 52 107.9 44.1 26.5   48.3 28 76.2
Red Holzman 1300 696 54 104.9           74.1
Erik Spoelstra 1152 680 59 102.8 41.9 22.3 7.7 46.7 36.1 75.8
Mike D'Antoni 1199 672 56 107.2 42.1 22.9 7.6 46.1 36.5 77.3
Mike Fratello 1215 667 55 99.6 41.1 22.7 8.4 46.7 35.6 75.7
Flip Saunders 1246 654 52 97.1 41.8 23.1 7.3 45.4 35.1 76.6
Chuck Daly 1075 638 59 105.3 45.1 24.4   47.1 30.7 76

 

As I was pouring through the list... I noted that many of the greats with high Win %... had Alltime Great Superstar players.

Jackson = Jordan, Kobe, and Shaq

Sloan = Stockton and Malone

Spoelstra = Wade, Bosh and Lebron

Popp = Timmy D.   

Riley = Magic, Mourning, Wade, Shaq.

So fourth and so on...

But who has Nate Had??

Who has Lenny Had??

Coaches on this most wins list with lower win% are probably coaches who didn't coach alltime greats.  I would suggest that they had to do a much harder job of coaching without the advantage of having a player who is good enough to guarantee you 40 wins just by being there. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Diesel said:
COACH GP W Win % PPG RPG APG SPG FG% 3P% FT%
Gregg Popovich 2083 1,356 65 100.9 43 22.8 7.3 46.7 37.1 75
Don Nelson 2398 1,335 56 108.2           76.3
Lenny Wilkens 2487 1,332 54 102.8 44.4 24       75.2
Jerry Sloan 2024 1,221 60 101.3 41.8 25.2 8.2 48 34.8 76.3
Pat Riley 1904 1,210 64 102.5 43 24.8   48   74.7
George Karl 1999 1,175 59 104.8 42.1 23.7 9.1 47.1 36 75.6
Phil Jackson 1640 1,155 70 103.1 43.7 24.1 8.4 47.2 35.6 73.7
Larry Brown 2002 1,098 55 99.9           73.9
Doc Rivers 1815 1,066 59 103.2 42 22.7 8 46.5 36.7 75.7
Rick Adelman 1791 1,042 58 104 44 23.6 8.4 45.7 35.2 76.1
Bill Fitch 2050 944 46 104.9 45 23.9       74.1
Red Auerbach 1419 938 66 103            
d*ck Motta 1952 935 48 106.5           75.4
Rick Carlisle 1646 882 54 101.4 42 22.2 7.4 45.3 35.7 77.6
Jack Ramsay 1647 864 52 110.5         26.6 75
Cotton Fitzsimmons 1607 832 52 110.7           75.6
Gene Shue 1645 784 48 107.4           74.3
Nate McMillan 1369 722 53 100.2 41.1 21.8 7.5 45.8 36.6 77.1
John MacLeod 1364 707 52 107.9 44.1 26.5   48.3 28 76.2
Red Holzman 1300 696 54 104.9           74.1
Erik Spoelstra 1152 680 59 102.8 41.9 22.3 7.7 46.7 36.1 75.8
Mike D'Antoni 1199 672 56 107.2 42.1 22.9 7.6 46.1 36.5 77.3
Mike Fratello 1215 667 55 99.6 41.1 22.7 8.4 46.7 35.6 75.7
Flip Saunders 1246 654 52 97.1 41.8 23.1 7.3 45.4 35.1 76.6
Chuck Daly 1075 638 59 105.3 45.1 24.4   47.1 30.7 76

 

 

Based on the list... this is the list.   Nate is borderline?  I mean Cotton Fitzsimmons and Bill Fitch are in the Hall but d*ck Motta and Jack Ramsey are not.   This last leg could be the deciding factor of if he gets in or not.

 

All this means nothing. 

Doc Rivers is above him and we all know he's only up there because he puts himself in position to win based on the roster, not his brain. 

Nate is not a good coach. He's just too dumb to know he should have already retired because he can't keep up with the evolution of the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...